Results 21 to 30 of about 10,141 (239)

Standard automated perimetry using size III and size V stimuli in advanced stage glaucoma: an observational cross-sectional comparative study. [PDF]

BMJ Open, 2021
Sood D, Czanner G, Somerville T, Sood I, Rowe FJ.   +4 more
europepmc   +3 more sources

Diagnostic Ability and Repeatability of a New Supra-Threshold Glaucoma Screening Program in Standard Automated Perimetry. [PDF]

Transl Vis Sci Technol, 2017
Takahashi N, Hirasawa K, Hoshina M, Kasahara M, Matsumura K, Shoji N.   +5 more
europepmc   +3 more sources

Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children

Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2013
Aims : The aim of this study was to compare the visual field test results in healthy children obtained via the Humphrey matrix 24-2 threshold program and standard automated perimetry (SAP) using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA)-Standard
Sibel Kocabeyoglu, Salih Uzun, Mehmet Cem Mocan, Banu Bozkurt, Murat Irkec, Mehmet Orhan   +5 more
doaj   +2 more sources

The Effect of Yellow Filter Use on Standard Automated Perimetry and Contrast Sensitivity in Healthy Individuals. [PDF]

Cureus
Triantafyllopoulos GI, Karabatsas CH, Pateras E, Chandrinos A, Kapralos D, Georgiou I, Tsiogka A, Kourkoutas D.   +7 more
europepmc   +3 more sources

Retinal Ganglion Cell Content Underlying Standard Automated Perimetry Size I to V Visual Sensitivities in the Non-Human Primate Experimental Glaucoma Model. [PDF]

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
Venkata Srinivasan V, Carter-Dawson L, Patel NB.   +2 more
europepmc   +3 more sources

Online Circular Contrast Perimetry: A Comparison to Standard Automated Perimetry

Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, 2023
The aim was to validate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of a novel 24-degree, 52-loci online circular contrast perimetry (OCCP) application to standard automated perimetry (SAP).Prospective cohort study.Two hundred and twenty participants (125 normal controls, 95 open angle glaucoma patients) were included.
Joshua Meyerov, Yuanchen Deng, Lazar Busija, Deus Bigirimana, Simon E. Skalicky   +4 more
openalex   +3 more sources

Comparison of isolated-check visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma and high-risk ocular hypertension. [PDF]

Int J Ophthalmol, 2017
Chen XW, Zhao YX.
europepmc   +2 more sources

Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage. [PDF]

Ophthalmology, 2014
Gardiner SK, Swanson WH, Goren D, Mansberger SL, Demirel S.   +4 more
europepmc   +2 more sources

Alterations induced by bangerter filters on the visual field: a frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry study. [PDF]

J Ophthalmol, 2015
Schiavi C, Tassi F, Finzi A, Cellini M.
europepmc   +3 more sources

False Positive Responses in Standard Automated Perimetry [PDF]

American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2022
To analyze the relationship between rates of false positive (FP) responses and standard automated perimetry results.Prospective multicenter cross-sectional study.One hundred twenty-six patients with manifest or suspect glaucoma were tested with Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard, SITA Fast, and SITA Faster at each of 2 visits ...
Anders Heijl, Vincent Michael Patella, John G. Flanagan, Aiko Iwase, Christopher K. Leung, Anja Tuulonen, Gary C. Lee, Thomas Callan, Boel Bengtsson   +8 more
openaire   +4 more sources