Results 81 to 90 of about 33,907 (201)
UNRAVELING THE THREADS OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: EXPLORING KEY PRINCIPLES
The analysis looks at how each of these principles influences the process of constitutional interpretation and how they may conflict or complement each other.
Д.Б. Махамбетсалиев +1 more
doaj +1 more source
The Race Horse That Wouldn\u27t Die: On Herrera v. Wyoming [PDF]
In Herrera v. Wyoming, the Supreme Court is considering how to reconcile the Crow Tribe’s hunting right with Wyoming’s sovereignty. This endeavor requires examining nineteenth-century treaties and precedents to decipher the intents of the Crow Tribe and ...
Cantor, Benjamin
core +1 more source
The Abiding Exceptionalism of Foreign Relations Doctrine [PDF]
In their article The Normalization of Foreign Relations Law, Professors Ganesh Sitaraman and Ingrid Wuerth argue that “[foreign affairs] exceptionalism . . . is now exceptional,” and that this is a good thing.
Vázquez, Carlos Manuel
core +1 more source
Judicial Power and Influence on Population Health. [PDF]
Gostin LO.
europepmc +1 more source
Gamble v. United States: A Commentary [PDF]
Under the judicially created dual-sovereignty exception, a defendant may be prosecuted by state and federal governments for the same conduct, due to the fact that the state and federal government constitute two separate sovereignties.
Mullen, Kayla
core +1 more source
El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar las condiciones de creación, derogación y aplicación de los precedentes. Para ello, tomaremos como referencia la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional chileno en materia de protección del nasciturus ...
Alvaro Nuñez Vaquero +1 more
doaj
Grains of Sand or Butterfly Effect: Standing, the Legitimacy of Precedent, and Reflections on \u3cem\u3eHollingsworth\u3c/em\u3e and \u3cem\u3eWindsor\u3c/em\u3e [PDF]
One test of whether a scholarly work has achieved canonical status is to ask respected scholars in the field which works, setting aside their own, are essential reads.
Stearns, Maxwell L.
core +1 more source
Prospective Overruling and the Revival of ‘Unconstitutional\u27 Statutes [PDF]
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey reshaped the law of abortion in this country. The Court overturned two of its previous decisions invalidating state restrictions on abortions, Thornburgh v.
Sperling, Gene B. +1 more
core +1 more source
Los precedentes judiciales en el derecho constitucional colombiano
La regla de precedente es la norma de los sistemas jurídicos que define el funcionamiento normativo de los precedentes judiciales. Los precedentes judiciales son normas generales y abstractas originadas en una decisión judicial.
Fabio Enrique Pulido Ortiz
doaj +1 more source

