Results 61 to 70 of about 2,044 (211)
To Overrule or Not? Precedent and the United States Supreme Court
The principle of stare decisis in United States courts appears in two aspects – the courts of lower jurisdiction are bound by the rulings issued by the courts of higher jurisdictions and as a horizontal binding of the Supreme Court by its own rulings ...
Eric J. Segall
doaj +1 more source
Resumo: O objeto do artigo consiste na investigação do conceito de stare decisis na jurisdição norte-americana e como ele desempenha uma função limitadora da discrição judicial, estabelecendo, a um só tempo, a estabilidade da interpretação constitucional
Alexandre Douglas Zaidan de Carvalho
doaj
Sin precedentes: una mirada escéptica a la regla del stare decisis
El presente trabajo pretende demostrar como si bien un ordenamiento sin ningún tipo de regla del precedente resulta disfuncional, tanto la identificación de su ratio decidendi como sus condiciones de aplicación resultan altamente indeterminadas.
Núñez Vaquero, Álvaro
doaj +1 more source
Bizarro Statutory Stare Decisis
In Smith v. City of Jackson, the Supreme Court applied to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act one of its decisions interpreting Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which Congress had overridden with the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
Prenkert, Jamie D
core
All Courts rule ex-post, after most economic decisions are sunk. This might generate a time-inconsistency problem. From an ex-ante perspective, Courts will have the (ex-post) temptation to be excessively lenient.
Riboni, Alessandro +2 more
core
Precedent and United States Administrative Law
In the common law order, precedent is not only a matter of applying law but also of making law. The crucial function of stare decisis is to relieve the appearance of judicial arbitrariness.
William A. Edmundson
doaj +1 more source
Roles and the Moral Practice of Precedent. [PDF]
Van Wees N.
europepmc +1 more source
The question whether stare decisis is compatible with originalism has occupied both originalists and their critics. In this Essay, I explore what light Justice Scalia’s approach to precedent casts on that question.
Barrett, Amy Coney
core
Authority by Representation – A New Form of Authority?
The majority decision in Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd [2016] ZACC 13 recognises a new form of actual authority – authority by representation. However, the decision is based on a misinterpretation of English law and is inconsistent with an extensive body of
Robert Sharrock
doaj +1 more source
All Courts rule ex-post, after most economic decisions are sunk. This might generate a time-inconsistency problem. From an ex-ante perspective, Courts will have the (ex-post) temptation to be excessively lenient.
Riboni, Alessandro +2 more
core

