Results 51 to 60 of about 21,915 (191)
La obligatoriedad de los principios del derecho en el common law de los Estados Unidos
El common law funciona basado en un principio procesal denominado stare decisis, que garantiza un cierto nivel de seguridad jurídica en las decisiones que toman los tribunales, sin embargo, dicho principio procesal no es una directriz inexorable, porque
Néstor Raúl Londoño S.
doaj
Abstract With the next pandemic likely not far off, the debate over the suitability of a broad, general vaccination mandate (GVM) goes on. This essay proposes a novel argument in favor of GVM—one based on the reality that left to its own devices, executive power, from governments to the local administration and even corporations, tends anyway to impose
Ciprian N. Radavoi
wiley +1 more source
Has the UK Supreme Court Become More Restrained in Public Law Cases?
In recent years, a number of academics, judges and politicians have noted that the UK Supreme Court has adopted a more restrained approach when it comes to public law than it had done previously. This article assesses the quantitative and qualitative evidence for this apparent conservative turn.
Lewis Graham
wiley +1 more source
A força dos precedentes no novo Código de Processo Civil
Embora o Brasil possua um sistema jurídico essencialmente baseado na Civil Law, é possível constatar que os precedentes judiciais estão sendo aos poucos adotados pela legislação processual civil com a finalidade de imprimir maior segurança jurídica aos ...
Elpídio Donizetti
doaj
From moral rights to legal rights? Lessons from healthcare contexts
Abstract Many believe the existence of a moral right to some good should lead to recognition of a corresponding legal right to that good. If, for instance, there is a moral right to healthcare, it is natural to believe countries should recognize a legal right to healthcare.
Michael Da Silva
wiley +1 more source
Bizarro Statutory Stare Decisis [PDF]
In Smith v. City of Jackson, the Supreme Court applied to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act one of its decisions interpreting Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which Congress had overridden with the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
Prenkert, Jamie D
core
Stare Decisis and Due Process [PDF]
In this Article, I argue that the preclusive effect of precedent raises due-process concerns, and, on occasion, slides into unconstitutionality. The Due Process Clause requires that a court give a person notice and an opportunity for a hearing before ...
Barrett, Amy Coney
core +1 more source
It is known that precedent, as a form of justification endowed with the authority of those who pass it, invariably unfolds upon the juridical phenomenon, especially regarding legal reasoning, and serves, to a greater or lesser extent, to conform the ...
Gabriel Sardenberg Cunha
doaj +1 more source
Do genuíno precedente do stare decisis ao precedente brasileiro
Trata-se de artigo cuja finalidade é exclusivamente comparativa. O escopo é demonstrar que não devemos confundir o sistema de provimentos vinculantes do CPC-2015 com o sistema genuíno de precedentes do direito inglês.
Georges Abboud
doaj +2 more sources
Stare Decisis and Common Sense in American Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence
Based on various law sources, the American common law is connected by a particular role of prior judicial rulings as a basis of judicial practice. The principle of stare decisis, which exists within its framework, leads to considering decisions of courts
John McClellan Marshall +2 more
doaj +1 more source

