Results 31 to 40 of about 21,915 (191)
Why Should Competition Lawyers Care about the Formal Rule of Law?
The Modern Law Review, Volume 84, Issue 3, Page 608-635, May 2021.
Ryan Stones
wiley +1 more source
Ensuring Uniform Case Law in Slovenia: Jurisprudence Constante, Stare Decisis, and a Third Approach
The judicial doctrine of jurisprudence constante is a civil-law equivalent of the common law doctrine of stare decisis. Both doctrines resulted from the 19th-century legal positivist movement criticizing the liberty of courts when deciding like cases. If
Marko Novak
doaj +1 more source
Variaciones sobre el precedente judicial. Una mirada desde el sistema jurídico chileno
El presente trabajo es el resultado de mi participación en el evento de discusión de la revista Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho, que llevó por nombre “La construcción del precedente en el Civil Law: debates, conceptos y desafíos”, en ...
Flavia Carbonell Bellolio
doaj +1 more source
Stare decisis and information abundance in a common law jurisdiction
In a common law jurisdiction, according to the principle of stare decisis judges are bound to interpret a constitutional or common law principle by applying authoritative cases already decided. Parties in disputes pending before the courts must find and
Emily Roscoe, Charles Szypszak
doaj +1 more source
NONMUTUAL COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL AND THE STARE DECISIS
An approximation between the nonmutual collateral estoppel and the stare decisis has been object of a very important discussion in the US law. As the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 attends to both issues (articles 503, 926 and 927 of the Code), it is ...
Luiz Guilherme Marinoni
doaj +1 more source
Toward a Theory of "Stare Decisis" [PDF]
I shall propose in this article a new theory of stare decisis (a term I use loosely to mean the practice of courts in deciding new cases in accordance with precedents) that draws upon the insights of communications theory as well as upon some previous work of my own on the decision-making process in tort law.
openaire +1 more source
A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?
The article revolves around the doctrine of precedent within the so-called European legal space, wondering whether and to what extent we can speak of a convergence towards a stare decisis model boosted by the harmonizing role of the Court of Justice of ...
Stefano Civitarese
doaj +1 more source
Of hired guns and ideologues: Why would a law firm ever retain an honest expert witness?
Abstract Suppose that expert witnesses appearing in litigation are, generically, either honest in their assessment of a fact situation or are advocates who testify in favour of their retaining party, regardless of new information. The type of a witness is known to law firms, who engage with them repeatedly, but not to courts.
Martin Richardson, Jose Rodrigues‐Neto
wiley +1 more source
Precedentes vinculantes à brasileira?
RESUMO: Trata-se de breve estudo sobre as regras processuais que atribuem certos graus de efeito vinculante a determinados pronunciamentos judiciais, tais como encartadas pelo legislador de 2015 no subsistema instituído pelo Novo Código de Processo ...
Murilo Strätz
doaj +1 more source
Executive Orders Under Judicial Scrutiny: The Role of Partisanship in Judicial Outcomes
ABSTRACT Scholars have extensively examined the executive branch's success in the federaljudiciary, principally through the Solicitor General's influence on the U.S. Supreme Court. Yet, scholars have focused little attention on the factors that affect the president's ability to successfully defend legal challenges to executive orders.
Matthew J. Zinno
wiley +1 more source

