Results 41 to 50 of about 2,044 (211)
O CPC 25 R1 (2009) apresenta os critérios para reconhecimento, mensuração e evidenciação das provisões, passivos contingentes e ativos contingentes, cujas regras gerais também são aplicadas aos processos judiciais ou administrativos que têm alguma ...
Bruno Rodrigues Teixeira de Lima +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Law, Justice and Reason‐Giving
ABSTRACT Reason‐giving is a hallmark of judicial decision‐making. However, many judicial decisions are not accompanied by detailed reasons—or any reasons at all. Judicial reason‐giving serves various goals, including constraining judges' discretion. The very engagement in writing and the enhanced accountability that comes with the provision of written ...
Ori Katz, Eyal Zamir
wiley +1 more source
Legal Uniformity in American Courts
Intercircuit splits occur when two or more circuits on the U.S. Courts of Appeals issue different legal rules about the same legal question. When this happens, federal law is applied differently in different parts of the country. Intercircuit splits cause legal nonuniformity, are an impediment to lawyering and judging, and have practical consequences ...
Deborah Beim, Kelly Rader
wiley +1 more source
Public pension contract minimalism
Abstract The national pension debt and COVID crises have collided. Post‐pandemic economic decline has escalated existing financial strains on state and local pension plans, impacting workers and the public welfare. With unfunded obligations exceeding one trillion dollars, many of these plans are in jeopardy.
T. Leigh Anenson, Hannah R. Weiser
wiley +1 more source
Framing a Knowledge Base for a Legal Expert System Dealing with Indeterminate Concepts
Despite decades of development of formal tools for modelling legal knowledge and reasoning, the creation of a fully fledged legal decision support system remains challenging. Among those challenges, such system requires an enormous amount of commonsense knowledge to derive legal expertise.
Michał Araszkiewicz +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Still No(,) More Bolam Please: McCulloch and others v Forth Valley Health Board
McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board concerned an allegation of negligence, in failing to consider treating pericarditis with non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs as a reasonable alternative treatment and not discussing this option with the patient.
Clark Hobson
wiley +1 more source
All Courts rule ex-post, after most economic decisions are sunk. This might generate a time-inconsistency problem. From an ex-ante perspective, Courts will have the (ex-post) temptation to be excessively lenient.
Alessandro Riboni +2 more
core +1 more source
Abstract With the next pandemic likely not far off, the debate over the suitability of a broad, general vaccination mandate (GVM) goes on. This essay proposes a novel argument in favor of GVM—one based on the reality that left to its own devices, executive power, from governments to the local administration and even corporations, tends anyway to impose
Ciprian N. Radavoi
wiley +1 more source
Has the UK Supreme Court Become More Restrained in Public Law Cases?
In recent years, a number of academics, judges and politicians have noted that the UK Supreme Court has adopted a more restrained approach when it comes to public law than it had done previously. This article assesses the quantitative and qualitative evidence for this apparent conservative turn.
Lewis Graham
wiley +1 more source
La obligatoriedad de los principios del derecho en el common law de los Estados Unidos
El common law funciona basado en un principio procesal denominado stare decisis, que garantiza un cierto nivel de seguridad jurídica en las decisiones que toman los tribunales, sin embargo, dicho principio procesal no es una directriz inexorable, porque
Néstor Raúl Londoño S.
doaj

