Results 181 to 190 of about 12,768 (237)

How and Why Do Patients Become More Objective? Sterba Compared with Strachey

open access: closedPsychoanalytic Quarterly, 1992
What Richard Sterba described in his influential paper was not, as some have thought, a lasting alliance between patient and analyst but a momentary dissociative state, accompanying the analysis of transference resistance, in which the patient detaches himself from his strivings and views himself objectively before lapsing back into normal coherence ...
Lawrence M. Friedman
exaly   +5 more sources

Reasonable Pluralism, Interculturalism, and Sterba on Question-Beggingness

open access: closedJournal of Ethics, 2014
In From Rationality to Equality, James Sterba (From rationality to equality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013) argues that the non-moral, and non-controversial, principle of logic, the principle that good arguments do not beg-the-question, provides a rationally conclusive response to egoism.
David Cummiskey
exaly   +3 more sources

Sterba on Machan's “Concession”

open access: closedJournal of Social Philosophy, 2001
Reponse a J. Sterba concernant la position de l'A. sur la relation entre l'ideal de liberte, le bien-etre de la communaute et la conception libertaire des droits individuels.
Tibor R. Machan
openaire   +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Response to Sterba’s Response

Abstract Although parents or the State ought never to permit certain evils, God may be justified in permitting them, since he has far greater rights over us, and far greater power to compensate us. The difference between ‘horrendous’ and ‘significant’ evils is a matter of degree.
exaly   +2 more sources

Response to Sterba

open access: closed, 2010
Jan Narveson, James P. Sterba
openaire   +2 more sources

Richard F. Sterba 1898–1989

The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 1990
(1990). Richard F. Sterba 1898–1989. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly: Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 451-454.
openaire   +2 more sources

Sterba on Amoralism and Begging the Question

Philosophical Inquiries, 2013
While sympathetic to Sterba’s equalitarian convictions, Lippert-Rasmussen attacks that Sterba’s rationality-to-morality argument. He presents six objections to show that Sterba’s main argument grounded on the principle of non-question-beggingness fails to defeat amoralism. He also argues that another argument offered by Sterba to defeat amoralism fails
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy