Results 181 to 190 of about 12,768 (237)
How and Why Do Patients Become More Objective? Sterba Compared with Strachey
What Richard Sterba described in his influential paper was not, as some have thought, a lasting alliance between patient and analyst but a momentary dissociative state, accompanying the analysis of transference resistance, in which the patient detaches himself from his strivings and views himself objectively before lapsing back into normal coherence ...
Lawrence M. Friedman
exaly +5 more sources
Reasonable Pluralism, Interculturalism, and Sterba on Question-Beggingness
In From Rationality to Equality, James Sterba (From rationality to equality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013) argues that the non-moral, and non-controversial, principle of logic, the principle that good arguments do not beg-the-question, provides a rationally conclusive response to egoism.
David Cummiskey
exaly +3 more sources
Sterba on Machan's “Concession”
Reponse a J. Sterba concernant la position de l'A. sur la relation entre l'ideal de liberte, le bien-etre de la communaute et la conception libertaire des droits individuels.
Tibor R. Machan
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Abstract Although parents or the State ought never to permit certain evils, God may be justified in permitting them, since he has far greater rights over us, and far greater power to compensate us. The difference between ‘horrendous’ and ‘significant’ evils is a matter of degree.
exaly +2 more sources
exaly +2 more sources
Review of James Sterba, Is a Good God Logically Possible?
Felipe Leon
openaire +2 more sources
The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 1990
(1990). Richard F. Sterba 1898–1989. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly: Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 451-454.
openaire +2 more sources
(1990). Richard F. Sterba 1898–1989. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly: Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 451-454.
openaire +2 more sources
Sterba on Amoralism and Begging the Question
Philosophical Inquiries, 2013While sympathetic to Sterba’s equalitarian convictions, Lippert-Rasmussen attacks that Sterba’s rationality-to-morality argument. He presents six objections to show that Sterba’s main argument grounded on the principle of non-question-beggingness fails to defeat amoralism. He also argues that another argument offered by Sterba to defeat amoralism fails
openaire +2 more sources

