Results 191 to 200 of about 12,768 (237)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Sterba's Program of Philosophical Reconciliation
Journal of Social Philosophy, 1999Evaluation du programme de reconciliation philosophique entre la morale et la politique, en general, et entre le libertarisme et le liberalisme-providence, en particulier, developpe par J. Sterba, concernant les trois points suivants: 1) les doctrines abstraites; 2) leur comportement face aux fondements moraux; 3) leur application a la pratique ...
openaire +1 more source
On Sterba’s Argument from Rationality to Morality
The Journal of Ethics, 2014James Sterba argues for morality as a principled compromise between self-regarding and other-regarding reasons (Morality as Compromise) and that either egoists or altruists, who always give overriding weight to self-regarding and other-reasons, respectively, can be shown to beg the question against morality.
openaire +1 more source
Sterba, Thomas, Herders neues Klösterlexikon
1970Theologie und Philosophie, Bd. 85 Nr.
openaire +1 more source
A FAILED RECONCILIATION: FURTHER REFLECTIONS ON STERBA'S PROJECT
Journal of Social Philosophy, 1994Although I do not find any of Sterba's responses to my recent criticisms of his work How to Make People Just convincing, I shall not attempt to answer them point by point since this would be a boring, scholastic exercise at best.1 Rather, I shall expand upon what I believe continue to be the three major problems with Sterba's theory and explain why his
openaire +1 more source
Thomas Sterba (Hrsg.): Herders neues Klösterlexikon
1970Ordenskorrespondenz, Bd. 52 Nr.
openaire +1 more source
Peacemaking Philosophy or Appeasement? Sterba’s Argument for Compromise
International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2005In The Triumph of Practice over Theory in Ethics James Sterba is not concerned merely to show that there is much convergence in the practical application of Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelian virtue ethics. His project is the much more ambitious one of arguing that the theories do not really diverge very much at the theoretical level, and ...
openaire +1 more source
Sterba's Horrendous Evils and Adams' Goodness of God
Eleutheria: John W. Rawlings School of Divinity Academic JournalThis article articulates and responds to James Sterba’s Problem of Horrendous Evils from his recent work Is A Good God Logically Possible. Specifically, this article argues that Sterba’s arguments against Marilyn McCord Adams' compensatory theodicy fails to undermine the effectiveness of the theodicy.
openaire +2 more sources

