Results 181 to 190 of about 2,663,426 (338)
From Courtroom to Intensive Care Unit: The Unfinished Journey of End-of-life Care in India. [PDF]
Salhotra R.
europepmc +1 more source
Does the Rule of Law Require the Separation of Powers?
The separation of powers is an enigmatic political ideal, particularly in the context of the modern administrative state, in which administrative officials routinely perform a combination of legislative, judicial, and executive functions. In this article we reexamine this ideal by interrogating Adrian Vermeule's provocative claim that the separation of
Dimitrios Kyritsis, Matthew Lewans
wiley +1 more source
Dementia subtype specification and cognitive evidence visibility in Turkish Court of Cassation decisions: a document analysis of 1,031 decisions (2005-2025). [PDF]
Güzel A, İncebacak F, Issı ES.
europepmc +1 more source
Rylands v Fletcher Redux: Rubis Bahamas Ltd v Russell
The decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Rubis Bahamas Ltd v Russell is the most significant development in the law of Rylands v Fletcher for decades. Rejecting the view that the rule is merely a sub‐species of private nuisance, the Committee reconstructed it as an independent rule of strict liability governing harm caused by ...
Marco Cappelletti
wiley +1 more source
Is the Supreme Court veering rightward? The ebb and flow of representation. [PDF]
Jessee S, Malhotra N, Sen M.
europepmc +1 more source
Consideration Without Economic Duress: Reframing the Analysis of Contractual Modifications
Prevailing approaches to the contractual enforceability of modifications revise or dispense with the requirement of consideration and invoke economic duress to rule out unfair, inequitable, or bad faith modifications. Enforceability turns effectively on the absence of economic duress. But economic duress is a doctrine of avoidance.
Peter Benson
wiley +1 more source
The Essentials of Compassionate End-of-life Care in the Intensive Care Unit: Lessons from the Harish Rana Case. [PDF]
Mani RK.
europepmc +1 more source
The Supreme Court in Re X and Y (Adoption Order: Setting Aside) confirms that there is no power under the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to set aside a properly made adoption order, even if the child's welfare would be better served by un‐doing the adoption.
Rob George
wiley +1 more source

