Results 161 to 170 of about 26,960 (218)
When patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease are misdiagnosed as having nonconvulsive status epilepticus. [PDF]
Gélisse P, Crespel A.
europepmc +1 more source
Assessing the Relational Abilities of Large Language Models and Large Reasoning Models. [PDF]
Raemaekers M, Finn M, De Houwer J.
europepmc +1 more source
Disentangling Brillouin's Negentropy Law of Information and Landauer's Law on Data Erasure. [PDF]
Lairez D.
europepmc +1 more source
Adults Represent Others' Logical Inferences Even When It Is Unnecessary. [PDF]
Fogd D, Téglás E, Kovács ÁM.
europepmc +1 more source
Cognitive biases and contextual factors explaining variability in nurses' fall risk judgements: a multi-centre cross-sectional study. [PDF]
Takase M +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Computational Intelligence, 1988
This paper provides a systematic treatment of possibly imprecisely or vaguely specified numerical quantifiers in default syllogisms, following an approach initiated by Zadeh. The obtained propagation rules are derived from simple properties of relative cardinality or, equivalently, conditional probability.
Dubois, Didier, Prade, Henri
openaire +2 more sources
This paper provides a systematic treatment of possibly imprecisely or vaguely specified numerical quantifiers in default syllogisms, following an approach initiated by Zadeh. The obtained propagation rules are derived from simple properties of relative cardinality or, equivalently, conditional probability.
Dubois, Didier, Prade, Henri
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2008
The hypothetical syllogism is invalid in standard interpretations of conditional sentences. Many arguments of this sort are quite compelling, though, and you can wonder what makes them so. I shall argue that it is our parsimony in regard to connections among events and states of affairs.
openaire +1 more source
The hypothetical syllogism is invalid in standard interpretations of conditional sentences. Many arguments of this sort are quite compelling, though, and you can wonder what makes them so. I shall argue that it is our parsimony in regard to connections among events and states of affairs.
openaire +1 more source
Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1962
Anyone who reads Aristotle, knowing something about modern logic and nothing about its history, must ask himself why the syllogistic cannot be translated as it stands into the logic of quantification. It is now more than twenty years since the invention of the requisite framework, the logic of many-sorted quantification.In the familiar first-order ...
openaire +2 more sources
Anyone who reads Aristotle, knowing something about modern logic and nothing about its history, must ask himself why the syllogistic cannot be translated as it stands into the logic of quantification. It is now more than twenty years since the invention of the requisite framework, the logic of many-sorted quantification.In the familiar first-order ...
openaire +2 more sources
1999
Aristotle is often blamed for developing the theory of syllogism instead of writing a Greek version of Frege’s Begriffsschrift. With hindsight, however, one must admit that he had a good reason for doing so: syllogism, and more generally monadic logic, is decidable whereas polyadic and even dyadic logic is undecidable. As van Heijenoort [10] points out,
openaire +2 more sources
Aristotle is often blamed for developing the theory of syllogism instead of writing a Greek version of Frege’s Begriffsschrift. With hindsight, however, one must admit that he had a good reason for doing so: syllogism, and more generally monadic logic, is decidable whereas polyadic and even dyadic logic is undecidable. As van Heijenoort [10] points out,
openaire +2 more sources

