Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication? [PDF]
, 2013 BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews provide a synthesis of evidence for practitioners, for clinical practice guideline developers, and for those designing and justifying primary research.
Beller, Elaine M. +3 more
core +1 more source
A systematic review of how studies describe educational interventions for evidence-based practice:Stage 1 of the development of a reporting guideline [PDF]
, 2014 Background The aim of this systematic review was to identify which information is included when reporting educational interventions used to facilitate foundational skills and knowledge of evidence-based practice (EBP) training for health ...
Galipeau, James +8 more
core +2 more sources
Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research:A meta-epidemiological study [PDF]
, 2020 Strategies to identify and mitigate publication bias and outcome reporting bias are frequently adopted in systematic reviews of clinical interventions but it is not clear how often these are applied in systematic reviews relating to quantitative health ...
Ayorinde, Abimbola A. +6 more
core +3 more sources
Exploring the challenges of implementing e-health: a protocol for an update of a systematic review of reviews. [PDF]
, 2015 There is great potential for e-health to deliver cost-effective, quality healthcare and spending on e-health systems by governments and healthcare systems is increasing worldwide.
Lau, R, Murray, E, Ross, J, Stevenson, F
core +1 more source
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review
Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2021 Executive summary/Abstract Background In spite of the large number of anti‐corruption reforms implemented in different countries, there has been little research that empirically and systematically assesses the impact of these efforts. Objectives The main
Giulia Mugellini +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, 2023 Objective: To determine the risk difference and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) for postoperative infections (POIs) associated with preoperative epidural steroid injections (ESIs) in adults undergoing lumbar or cervical spine surgery.
W. Michael Hooten, MD +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Shades of Grey: guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies [PDF]
, 2016 This paper suggests how the ‘grey literature’, the diverse and heterogeneous body of material that is made public outside, and not subject to, traditional academic peer-review processes, can be used to increase the relevance and impact of management and ...
Adams, Richard J. +2 more
core +3 more sources
Giving urban policy its 'medical': assessing the place of health in area-based regeneration [PDF]
, 2006 How does regeneration affect health and how have successive urban policy evaluations sought to measure such impacts? This article draws on a systematic review of national-level evaluation documentation relating to government-funded, area-based ...
Atkinson, R. +3 more
core +1 more source
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2005 Systematic reviews retrieve, appraise and summarise all the available evidence on a specific health question. They are designed to reduce the effect of the reviewers' own bias, and a full protocol should be written to define and guide the process. The appropriate resources should be in place before undertaking a review.
Adrian, White, Katja, Schmidt
openaire +2 more sources
Chapter Three. EED library as a basis for systematic reviews [PDF]
, 2016 3.1 Defining Systematic Review Question Priorities 3.2 Determining Relevance to the Systematic Review 3.3 Acquisition of References and Copyright Fair Use Compliance 3.4 Documenting Relevance to the Systematic Review 3.5 Data Extraction for the ...
Denno, Donna M +4 more
core +1 more source