Results 261 to 270 of about 177,558,944 (306)

Identifying determinants of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy following breast cancer: A systematic review of reviews. [PDF]

Cancer Med
Todd A, Waldron C, McGeagh L, Norris R, Bolnykh I, Stewart SJ, Slodkowska-Barabasz J, Moon Z, Cahir C, Thompson S, Harmer V, Wells M, Watson E, Sharp L, SWEET Research Team.   +14 more
europepmc   +1 more source

PAK1 activation drives divergent resistance mechanisms to aromatase inhibition and tamoxifen in a luminal: A breast cancer model

Molecular Oncology, EarlyView.
Breast cancer remains a major cause of cancer death in women, frequently developing endocrine therapy resistance. This study demonstrates that upregulated p21‐activated kinase 1 (PAK1) activity drives resistance to tamoxifen and long‐term estrogen deprivation in ER+ breast cancer models.
Luisa Schwarzmüller, Janina Müller, Efstathios‐Iason Vlachavas, Lukas Beumers, Lena Fleischhacker, Sara Burmester, Angelika Wörner, Sabine Karolus, Dominic Helm, Cindy Körner, Stefan Wiemann   +10 more
wiley   +1 more source

Effectiveness of Trauma-Informed Care Implementation in Health Care Settings: Systematic Review of Reviews and Realist Synthesis. [PDF]

Perm J
Goldstein E, Chokshi B, Melendez-Torres GJ, Rios A, Jelley M, Lewis-O'Connor A.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Mapping Quality Indicators to Assess Older Adult Health and Care in Community-, Continuing-, and Acute-Care Settings: A Systematic Review of Reviews and Guidelines. [PDF]

Healthcare (Basel)
Karimi-Dehkordi M, Hanson HM, Kennedy M, Wagg A.   +3 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Systematic reviews

Nursing Standard, 2015
Despite the increasing popularity of systematic reviews, there remains a need to ensure that they are conducted rigorously and provide an objective critical summary of research findings. The strength of a systematic review is its rigorous methodological approach to interrogating a body of literature. Both authors and readers should be familiar with the
Halcomb, Elizabeth J, Fernandez, Ritin S
openaire   +3 more sources

A systematic review of reviews of systematic reviews of acupuncture

Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies, 2013
AbstractBackgroundAcupuncture is one of the more popular forms of complementary and alternative medicine. Whilst the therapy has been the subject of many published trials, systematic reviews and reviews of reviews, the conclusions of these publications often have been inconsistent.ObjectivesTo systematically review reviews of reviews of acupuncture in ...
Andrew Gilbey, Edzard Ernst, Kawtar Tani
openaire   +1 more source

Systematic Reviews

Oncology Nursing Forum, 2014
Systematic reviews are a type of literature review in which authors systematically search for, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence from several studies on the same topic (Grant & Booth, 2009). The precise and systematic method differentiates systematic reviews from traditional reviews (Khan, Kunz, Kleijnen, & Antes, 2003).
openaire   +2 more sources

From standard systematic reviews to living systematic reviews

Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2023
Systematic reviews (SRs) have become a central tool for evidence-based health care over the last 30 years. The number of SRs being published has increased steadily. However, concerns have been raised regarding the duplication of work, methodological flaws and the currency of many systematic reviews, also in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Breuer, Claudia, Meerpohl, Jörg J., Siemens, Waldemar   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources