Results 11 to 20 of about 16,299,319 (250)

The Problems with Systematic Reviews: A Living Systematic Review.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2023
OBJECTIVE Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are proliferating, as they are an important building block to inform evidence-based guidelines and decision-making.
L. Uttley, Daniel S. Quintana, P. A. Montgomery, C. Carroll, M. Page, L. Falzon, A. Sutton, D. Moher   +7 more
semanticscholar   +4 more sources

How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses

Annual Review of Psychology, 2019
Systematic reviews are characterized by a methodical and replicable methodology and presentation. They involve a comprehensive search to locate all relevant published and unpublished work on a subject; a systematic integration of search results; and a ...
Larry V. Hedges, Andy P Siddaway, Alex M Wood   +2 more
exaly   +2 more sources

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

PLoS Medicine, 2021
Matthew Page and co-authors describe PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
M. Page, J. McKenzie, P. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. Hoffmann, C. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J. Tetzlaff, E. Akl, S. Brennan, R. Chou, Julie May Glanville, J. Grimshaw, A. Hrõbjartsson, M. Lalu, Tian-Jing Li, E. Loder, E. Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, L. McGuinness, L. Stewart, James Thomas, A. Tricco, V. Welch, P. Whiting, D. Moher   +25 more
semanticscholar   +3 more sources

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews

Systematic Reviews, 2021
Background Literature searches underlie the foundations of systematic reviews and related review types. Yet, the literature searching component of systematic reviews and related review types is often poorly reported.
M. Rethlefsen, S. Kirtley, S. Waffenschmidt, A. P. Ayala, D. Moher, M. Page, Jonathan B. Koffel   +6 more
semanticscholar   +2 more sources

Evaluating and Optimising the Retrieval of Research Evidence for Systematic Reviews of Adverse Drug Effects and Adverse Drug Reactions [PDF]

, 2013
Systematic reviews can provide timely, reliable evidence on which to make informed decisions. In order to make balanced decisions, information is not only needed on the benefits of an intervention, but also on its adverse effects.
Golder, Su
core   +5 more sources

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

British medical journal, 2020
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past
M. Page, J. McKenzie, P. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. Hoffmann, C. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J. Tetzlaff, E. Akl, S. Brennan, R. Chou, Julie May Glanville, J. Grimshaw, A. Hrõbjartsson, M. Lalu, Tian-Jing Li, E. Loder, E. Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, L. McGuinness, L. Stewart, James Thomas, A. Tricco, V. Welch, P. Whiting, D. Moher   +25 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Non-biomedical sources for systematic reviews of pharmaceutical policy [PDF]

, 2010
It has been well documented that reaching beyond MEDLINE into a diversity of databases enhances search results, but a chronic question in comprehensive and systematic searching is how far, and where, to search.
Greyson, Devon L.
core   +2 more sources

High-sensitivity troponin assays for early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and economic evaluation

Health Technology Assessment, 2021
Background: Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is important, but only 20% of emergency admissions for chest pain will actually have an acute myocardial infarction.
Marie Westwood, Bram Ramaekers, Sabine Grimm, Gill Worthy, Debra Fayter, Nigel Armstrong, Titas Buksnys, Janine Ross, Manuela Joore, Jos Kleijnen   +9 more
doaj   +1 more source

PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

British medical journal, 2020
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings.
M. Page, D. Moher, P. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. Hoffmann, C. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J. Tetzlaff, E. Akl, S. Brennan, R. Chou, Julie May Glanville, J. Grimshaw, A. Hrõbjartsson, M. Lalu, Tian-Jing Li, E. Loder, E. Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, L. McGuinness, L. Stewart, James Thomas, A. Tricco, V. Welch, P. Whiting, J. McKenzie   +25 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

A systematic review of clinical effectiveness and safety for historical and current treatment options for metachromatic leukodystrophy in children, including atidarsagene autotemcel

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 2023
Objective To understand the benefit-risk profile for historical and current treatments for MLD. Methods A systematic review was conducted on the effectiveness, safety, and costs of MLD treatments: allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)
Nigel Armstrong, Andrew Olaye, Caro Noake, Francis Pang   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source