Results 1 to 10 of about 1,564,342 (231)
Skepticism and the principle of sufficient reason [PDF]
AbstractThe Principle of Sufficient Reason must be justified dialectically: by showing the disastrous consequences of denying it. We formulate a version of the Principle that is restricted to basic natural facts, which entails the obtaining of at least one supernatural fact. Denying this principle results in extreme empirical skepticism.
Robert C Koons
exaly +3 more sources
On a principle of sufficient reason
In The Metaphysics of Creation and The Metaphysics of Theism, Norman Kretzmann defends an argument for God's existence which he claims to find in Aquinas. I assess this argument's key premise, a principle of sufficient reason, that: ‘PSR2: Every existing thing has a reason for its existence either in the necessity of its own nature or in the causal ...
Brian Leftow
openaire +3 more sources
Kant and the Principle of Sufficient Reason [PDF]
Leibniz, and many following him, saw the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) as pivotal to a scientific (demonstrated) metaphysics. Against this backdrop, Kant is expected to pay close attention to PSR in his reflections on the possibility of ...
Lu-Adler, Huaping
openaire +3 more sources
Schopenhauer׳s interpretation of “The Principle of Sufficient Reason” [PDF]
The principle of sufficient reason is one of the most significant philosophical principles. Arthur Schopenhauer, the well-known German philosopher, has emphasized on this principle and taken it as the entrance key element to his philosophical system.
abdollah amini, mohammad javad safian
doaj +2 more sources
On Kant’s Transcendental Argument(s) [PDF]
Presented in the “Critique of Pure Reason” transcendental philosophy is the first theory of science, which seeks to identify and study the conditions of the possibility of cognition.
Sergey Katrechko
doaj +4 more sources
Kant’s Humanism: A Loophole in the Principle of Sufficient Reason [PDF]
I consider the principle of sufficient reason (henceforth, PSR) as it functions in both Leibniz and Kant. The issue separating these thinkers is a modal status of absolute contingency, which is exempt from PSR insofar as it is neither logically necessary,
Daniel Dal Monte
doaj +2 more sources
The Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will [PDF]
I examine Leibniz’s version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason with respect to free will, paying particular attention to Peter van Inwagen’s argument that this principle leads to determinism. Ultimately I conclude that Leibniz’s formulation is incompatible with free will.
McAllister, Blake
openaire +3 more sources
Indefinite extensibility and the principle of sufficient reason [PDF]
The principle of sufficient reason threatens modal collapse. Some have suggested that by appealing to the indefinite extensibility of contingent truth, the threat is neutralized. This paper argues that this is not so. If the indefinite extensibility of contingent truth is developed in an analogous fashion to the most promising models of the indefinite ...
exaly +2 more sources
Incompatibilism and the Principle of Sufficient Reason in Kant’s 'Nova Dilucidatio'
The consensus is that in his 1755 'Nova Dilucidatio', Kant endorsed broadly Leibnizian compatibilism, then switched to a strongly incompatibilist position in the early 1760s.
Aaron Wells
doaj +4 more sources
Untangling Determinism: Revisiting the Principle of Sufficient Reason in the * Post-Avicennian Debates on Free Will [PDF]
Avicenna was one of the premodern philosophers who argued for the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR), namely the claim that everything has a cause and that no uncaused beings can exist.
10.12658/Nazariyat.9.2.M0210en
doaj +1 more source

