Results 1 to 10 of about 438,054 (267)
No violation of the Leibniz rule. No fractional derivative [PDF]
We demonstrate that a violation of the Leibniz rule is a characteristic property of derivatives of non-integer orders. We prove that all fractional derivatives D^a, which satisfy the Leibniz rule D^(fg)=(D^a f) g + f (D^a g), should have the integer ...
Tarasov, Vasily E.
exaly +3 more sources
Solvable Leibniz Algebras with Filiform Nilradical [PDF]
In this paper we continue the description of solvable Leibniz algebras whose nilradical is a filiform algebra. In fact, solvable Leibniz algebras whose nilradical is a naturally graded filiform Leibniz algebra are described in [6] and [8].
Camacho Santana, Luisa María +2 more
exaly +3 more sources
A Characterization of Nilpotent Leibniz Algebras
W. A. Moens proved that a Lie algebra is nilpotent if and only if it admits an invertible Leibniz-derivation. In this paper we show that with the definition of Leibniz-derivation from W. A.
Alice Fialowski, Bakhrom Omirov
exaly +3 more sources
The Classical Hom–Leibniz Yang–Baxter Equation and Hom–Leibniz Bialgebras
In this paper, we first introduce the notion of Hom–Leibniz bialgebras, which is equivalent to matched pairs of Hom–Leibniz algebras and Manin triples of Hom–Leibniz algebras.
Shuangjian Guo +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Is Immanuel Kant’s critique of the proofs of God’s existence accurate? In order to answer this question, I analyse Leibniz’ proof in his “Monadology” and I determine the relation between the cosmological and the ontological version of this proof.
Holger Gutschmidt
doaj +1 more source
On Hom-Leibniz and Hom-Lie-Yamaguti Superalgebras
In this paper some characterizations of Hom-Leibniz superalgebras are given and some of their basic properties are found. These properties can be seen as a generalization of corresponding well-known properties of Hom-Leibniz algebras. Considering the Hom-
Attan Sylvain +2 more
doaj +1 more source
On the derivations of Leibniz algebras of low dimension
Let L be an algebra over a field F. Then L is called a left Leibniz algebra if its multiplication operations [×, ×] addition- ally satisfy the so-called left Leibniz identity: [[a,b],c] = [a,[b,c]] – [b,[a,c]] for all elements a, b, c Î L. In this paper,
L.A. Kurdachenko +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Description of the automorphism groups of some Leibniz algebras
Let $L$ be an algebra over a field $F$ with the binary operations $+$ and $[,]$. Then $L$ is called a left Leibniz algebra if it satisfies the left Leibniz identity: $[[a,b],c]=[a,[b,c]]-[b,[a,c]]$ for all elements $a,b,c\in L$.
L.A. Kurdachenko, O.O. Pypka, M.M. Semko
doaj +1 more source
In this paper we prove the Leibniz analogue of Whitehead's vanishing theorem for the Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomology of Lie algebras. As a consequence, we obtain the second Whitehead lemma for Leibniz algebras.
Feldvoss, Jörg, Wagemann, Friedrich
core +3 more sources
On the derivations of cyclic Leibniz algebras
Let $L$ be an algebra over a field $F$. Then $L$ is called a left Leibniz algebra, if its multiplication operation $[-,-]$ additionally satisfies the so-called left Leibniz identity: $[[a,b],c]=[a,[b,c]]-[b,[a,c]]$ for all elements $a,b,c\in L$. A linear
M.M. Semko, L.V. Skaskiv, O.A. Yarovaya
doaj +1 more source

