Field and Laboratory Studies for Predicting Annual Generations of <i>Spodoptera littoralis</i> (Boisd.) Using Sex Pheromone Traps and Cumulative Heat Unit Measurements in Egypt. [PDF]
Ahmed AMM +8 more
europepmc +1 more source
Evaluation of nuclear abnormalities in buccal mucosa cells of grazing cattle from pastures routinely treated with 2,4-D: an exploratory field study. [PDF]
Vieira CS +7 more
europepmc +1 more source
Pelargonic Acid: From Historical Uses to Future Perspectives in Sustainable Agriculture. [PDF]
Preisler AC +7 more
europepmc +1 more source
Non-chemical weed control on hard surfaces:an investigation of long-term effects of thermal weed control methods [PDF]
openaire
Beyond Beneficial Margins: Four Mechanisms Linking Border Vegetation to Pest Dynamics. [PDF]
Cardoso JFM, Mundim FM.
europepmc +1 more source
Climate Change Drives Divergent Potential Habitat Dynamics of Invasive and Native Noxious Asteraceae Weeds in Yunnan Grasslands. [PDF]
Yang J, Chen P.
europepmc +1 more source
Related searches:
Thermal weed control technologies for conservation agriculture—a review
Weed Research, 2020Research and development activities on non‐chemical weed control methods to date have mainly focused on mechanical and thermal applications. Selectivity in mechanical weed control is obtained using dynamically actuated harrows. Selectivity in thermal weed control is obtained through a certain heat tolerance of the crop. In conservation agriculture (CA),
Christian Marx +2 more
exaly +4 more sources
Thermal Weed Control: History, Mechanisms, and Impacts
2018In the recent years, there has been a revival in the development and improvement of thermal weed control to deliver heat for weed management. Thermal weed control techniques are based on foliar contact mechanisms in which temperatures of approximately 100°C are applied for the duration of few seconds, resulting in intracellular water expansion and cell
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan +1 more
exaly +5 more sources
Highlights? Thermal stress affects tomato canopy reflectance in 480-670 and 720-810nm. ? Temperature-dependent classification performances ranging from 62.5% to 91.6%. ? Omission of 480-670nm stabilizes crop/weed discrimination with 86.4% accuracy. ? Site-specific calibration mitigates extreme temperature effects with 90.3% accuracy. ?
D C Slaughter
exaly +2 more sources

