Results 1 to 10 of about 33,288 (247)
Cultural Individualism–Collectivism and Third‐Party Punishment and Compensation [PDF]
PsyCh JournalABSTRACT This study examined how culture shapes third‐party punishment and compensation in the harm domain using realistic judicial scenarios. Chinese participants showed greater engagement in both forms than American participants, with individualism–collectivism values mediating these societal differences.
Yan Ye
exaly +4 more sources
Costly third-party interventions: The role of incidental anger and attention focus in punishment of the perpetrator and compensation of the victim [PDF]
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2016 Costly third-party interventions have been regarded as hallmarks of moral behavior, because they are unlikely to be motivated by self-interest. This research investigated the cognitive and emotional processes underlying two types of costly third-party interventions by manipulating incidental emotions and attention focus. In Study 1, we investigated the
Michaela Gummerum +2 more
exaly +5 more sources
Third-Party Punishment or Compensation? It Depends on the Reputational Benefits [PDF]
Frontiers in Psychology, 2021 Third-party fairness maintenance could win some reputational benefits, and it includes two methods: punishment and compensation. We predicted that the third parties' preference between punishment and compensation are affected by whether they are free to choose between the two methods, and the affection could be interpreted through reputational benefits.
Qiangqiang Li
exaly +4 more sources
Reputational and cooperative benefits of third-party compensation
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2018 Although third-party punishment helps sustain group cooperation, might victim compensation provide third-parties with superior reputational benefits? Across 24 studies (N = 21,296), we provide a comprehensive examination of the consequences of the choice between punishment and compensation.
Patil, Indrajeet +2 more
core +6 more sources
Third-party responses to injustice: a review on the preference for compensation [PDF]
Crime Psychology Review, 2017 People are often confronted with injustice that is done to others. In such cases, observers (i.e. third-parties) of injustice can restore justice by punishing the perpetrator, as shown by a vast amount of research. However, this focus on punishment has led to the neglect of another behavioural option: compensation of the victim.
Janne Van Doorn
exaly +3 more sources
Workmen's Compensation Insurer as Suable Third Party
Duke Law Journal, 1969 Until 1960, lawyers appeared to assume that the workmen's compensation insurance carrier partook of the employer's immunity to common law suit by an injured employee. Since then there has been a rapid. succession of judicial decisions, some holding the carrier liable as a third party for negligent safety inspections or medical services, some holding ...
Larson, Arthur
openaire +4 more sources
RISK OF COMPENSATION IN THE LIGHT OF HARM TO A THIRD PARTY BY AN EMPOYEE
Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Finansów i Prawa w Bielsku-Białej, 2016 The paper undertakes an analysis of an employer`s financial liability for damages caused by an employee to a third party. The author presents controversies which appeared in this field of law in the doctrine and judicature. An attempt was made to determine the basis and regulations that trigger the liability of the employer.
Marek Jasion
core +15 more sources
The role of attention and frames on third-party punishment and compensation choices
CognitionPeople often forgo their own self-interest to react to fairness and justice violations, even when not directly affected by the infraction. There are different ways to react to an injustice: some may prefer to punish the perpetrator, and others to compensate the victim.
Claudia Civai +2 more
exaly +3 more sources
An exploration of third parties’ preference for compensation over punishment: six experimental demonstrations [PDF]
Theory and Decision, 2018 Research suggests that to restore equity, third parties prefer compensation of a victim over the punishment of a perpetrator. It remains unclear, however, whether this preference for compensation is stable or specific to certain situations. In six experimental studies, we find that adjustments in the characteristics of the situation or in the available
Janne van Doorn +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Third-party sanctioning and compensation behavior: Findings from the ultimatum game
Journal of Economic Psychology, 2013 Abstract We measured the beliefs and behavior of third parties who were given the opportunity to add to or deduct from the payoffs of individuals who engaged in an economic bargaining game under different social contexts. Third parties rewarded bargaining outcomes that were equal and compensated victims of unfair bargaining outcomes rather than ...
Chavez, Alex K, Bicchieri, Cristina
openaire +3 more sources