Results 221 to 230 of about 519,603 (272)
Transcendental Arguments and the Problem of Dogmatism
International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2008 Transcendental arguments have been described as undogmatic or non-dogmatic arguments. This paper examines this contention critically and addresses the question of what is required from an argument for which the characterization is valid.
Oskari Kuusela
exaly +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Transcendental Arguments and ‘Epistemological Naturalism’
Philosophical Studies, 1977Abstract Stroud discusses Jay Rosenberg's Peirce‐inspired epistemological naturalism in relation to the requirements of a Kantian epistemological project that answers scepticism. Stroud explores the question of the possibility of conclusions of a special metaphysical status required for the success of such a project and sketches answers ...
Barry Stroud
exaly +2 more sources
2016
AbstractThis article explores Immanuel Kant’s transcendental argument in philosophy. According to Kant, a transcendental argument begins with a compelling first premise about our thought, experience, knowledge, or practice, and then reasons to a conclusion that is a substantive and unobvious presupposition and necessary condition of the truth of this ...
exaly +2 more sources
AbstractThis article explores Immanuel Kant’s transcendental argument in philosophy. According to Kant, a transcendental argument begins with a compelling first premise about our thought, experience, knowledge, or practice, and then reasons to a conclusion that is a substantive and unobvious presupposition and necessary condition of the truth of this ...
exaly +2 more sources
Noûs, 1983
Kant was concerned to refute Cartesian skepticism by showing that the existence of objects located in space is a condition for the possibility of self-conscious experience. There is widespread disagreement among Kant scholars about how Kant intended this refutation to proceed and even about which parts of the Critique of Pure Reason embody the crux of ...
openaire +1 more source
Kant was concerned to refute Cartesian skepticism by showing that the existence of objects located in space is a condition for the possibility of self-conscious experience. There is widespread disagreement among Kant scholars about how Kant intended this refutation to proceed and even about which parts of the Critique of Pure Reason embody the crux of ...
openaire +1 more source
The Nature of a Transcendental Argument
Journal of Critical Realism, 2004Jamie Morgan
exaly +2 more sources
Is Fichte’s Transcendental Thinking Transcendental Argument?
2014The ambiguous term “transcendental” never has one and the same meaning for different philosophical epochs or different philosophers.1 It is not an exaggeration to say that the meaning shift of the term “transcendental” often reflects a development of philosophical thinking itself.2 It is worth acknowledging that in the modern period Kant and the post ...
openaire +1 more source
The Nature of Transcendental Arguments
International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2005Abstract The paper aims to cast light on the kind of proof involved in central transcendental arguments. It is suggested that some of the difficulty associated with such arguments may result from the tendency to construe them simply as articulating relations between concepts or propositional contents.
exaly +2 more sources
Transcendental Arguments, Transcendental Synthesis and Transcendental Idealism
The Philosophical Quarterly, 1987Analyse de la notion d'argument transcendantal, comme specification des conditions necessaires d'une experience possible. L'A. montre que ce type d'argument en philosophie (chez Kant et chez d'autres auteurs) n'est pas lie a une forme de verificationnisme ni a une forme d'idealisme ...
openaire +1 more source
Transcendental Arguments and Realism
2003Abstract It almost amounts to a platitude that realism and transcendental arguments do not go well together. To see why, let us briefly rehearse the characteristics of transcendental arguments. (i) Their premisses have to be justified independently of any experience about the external world, i.e. they must be justified introspectively or
Thomas Grundmann, Catrin Misselhorn
exaly +2 more sources
2018
Transcendental arguments seek to answer scepticism by showing that the things doubted by a sceptic are in fact preconditions for the scepticism to make sense. Hence the scepticism is either meaningless or false. A transcendental argument works by finding the preconditions of meaningful thought or judgment.
openaire +1 more source
Transcendental arguments seek to answer scepticism by showing that the things doubted by a sceptic are in fact preconditions for the scepticism to make sense. Hence the scepticism is either meaningless or false. A transcendental argument works by finding the preconditions of meaningful thought or judgment.
openaire +1 more source