Results 121 to 130 of about 12,741,664 (270)

Hybrid Additive Manufacturing of Highly Stretchable Bottlebrush Polymer Nanocomposites by Decoupled Extrusion and Photopatterning

Advanced Materials Technologies, EarlyView.
A Hybrid Direct Ink Writing–Digital Light Processing (HDD) strategy decouples material extrusion from shape definition, enabling high‐fidelity additive manufacturing of highly viscous, yield‐stress polymer nanocomposites. Excess ink acts as a removable, self‐supporting scaffold, allowing fabrication of unsupported and embedded complex architectures ...
Shahryar Ramezani Bajgiran, Emmanuel Oduro, Daniel A. Rau, Li‐Heng Cai   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

F1000Research
The exponential increase in the number of submissions, further accelerated by generative AI, and the decline in the availability of experts are burdening the peer review process.
Mohamed L. Seghier
doaj   +1 more source

Photoluminescence Reshaping via Structural Confinement and Local Density of Optical States Control in Ir(III)‐Doped Biodegradable Metasurfaces

Advanced Materials Technologies, EarlyView.
Phosphorescent biodegradable metasurface showing vibronic selection and spectral photoluminescence narrowing. Anti‐correlation between experimental LDOS and measured lifetimes. ABSTRACT Metasurfaces incorporating phosphorescent emitters offer a route to engineer radiative and vibronic processes beyond chemical design.
Vincenzo Caligiuri, Andrea Smeriglio, Svetlana Siprova, Olga Favale, Francesca Leone, Roberto Termine, Debora Policastro, Alessandra Crispini, Attilio Golemme, Nicolas Godbert, Iolinda Aiello, Antonio De Luca   +11 more
wiley   +1 more source

Possibilities for the peer review of interdisciplinary research: a small-scale qualitative study

Research Integrity and Peer Review
Background Despite critiques from across academia, double-anonymised peer review is still considered the ‘gold standard’ quality-assurance tool for the publication of academic research. While some journals make use of ‘open’ peer-review practices to make
Georgia Vesma
doaj   +1 more source

There is no easy fix to peer review but paying referees and regulating the number of submissions might help [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

F1000Research
The exponential increase in the number of submissions, further accelerated by generative AI, and the decline in the availability of experts are burdening the peer review process.
Mohamed L. Seghier
doaj   +1 more source

Toward Perception‐Native Electronic Skin: Bio‐Inspired In‐/Near‐Sensor and Neuromorphic Computing for Humanoid Robots

Advanced Materials Technologies, EarlyView.
Dense tactile streams from across the humanoid body converge on collide in a central wiring and data bottleneck. By relocating computation closer to and then into the skin itself, near‐ and in‐sensor architectures, together with neuromorphic computing, chart a path toward perception‐native electronic skin, in which the conversion of stimulus into ...
Mijin Kim, Chang‐Jae Beak, Jiyoung Park, Youngdo Jung, Sunjong Oh, Sin‐Hyung Lee, Bo‐Yeon Lee   +6 more
wiley   +1 more source

Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

F1000Research
The exponential increase in the number of submissions, further accelerated by generative AI, and the decline in the availability of experts are burdening the peer review process.
Mohamed L. Seghier
doaj   +1 more source

TacScope: A Miniaturized Vision‐Based Tactile Sensor for Surgical Applications

Advanced Robotics Research, EarlyView.
TacScope is a compact, vision‐based tactile sensor designed for robot‐assisted surgery. By leveraging a curved elastomer surface with pressure‐sensitive particle redistribution, it captures high‐resolution 3D tactile feedback. TacScope enables accurate tumor detection and shape classification beneath soft tissue phantoms, offering a scalable, low‐cost ...
Md Rakibul Islam Prince, Sheeraz Athar, Pokuang Zhou, Yu She   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation [PDF]

I reviewed the published empirical evidence concerning journal peer review, which consisted of 68 papers, all but three published since 1975. Peer review improves quality, but its use to screen papers has met with limited success.
JS Armstrong
core  

Artificial Intelligence in Scholarly Peer Review: Ethical Considerations, Current Practices, and Future Implications

International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into scholarly peer review represents a fundamental transformation of academic publishing’s quality control mechanisms.
Aras Bozkurt
doaj   +1 more source