Results 21 to 30 of about 37,382,072 (281)
Modeling Carbohydrate Counting Error in Type 1 Diabetes Management
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2020 Background: The error in estimating meal carbohydrates (CHO) amount is a critical mistake committed by type 1 diabetes (T1D) subjects. The aim of this study is both to investigate which factors, related to meals and subjects, affect the CHO counting error most and to develop a mathematical model of CHO counting ...
Roversi C. +5 more
openaire +3 more sources
Biostatistics series module 5: Determining sample size
Indian Journal of Dermatology, 2016 Determining the appropriate sample size for a study, whatever be its type, is a fundamental aspect of biomedical research. An adequate sample ensures that the study will yield reliable information, regardless of whether the data ultimately suggests a ...
Avijit Hazra, Nithya Gogtay
doaj +1 more source
A comparison of four methods for the analysis of N-of-1 trials. [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2014 OBJECTIVE: To provide a practical guidance for the analysis of N-of-1 trials by comparing four commonly used models. METHODS: The four models, paired t-test, mixed effects model of difference, mixed effects model and meta-analysis of summary data were ...
Xinlin Chen, Pingyan Chen
doaj +1 more source
Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2022 Background: Routinely collected healthcare data such as administrative claims and electronic health records (EHR) can complement clinical trials and spontaneous reports to detect previously unknown risks of vaccines, but uncertainty remains about the ...
Martijn J. Schuemie +21 more
doaj +1 more source
Empirical Type 1 Error Rate and Power Comparisons of Normality Tests with R
Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 2018 Normality is one of the main presuppositions instatistical tests. The multiplicity of the normality tests bring out anotherproblem of choosing the appropriate test for researchers.
Ülkü Erişoğlu +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Erratum to “Mitigating Quantization Lobes in mmWave Low-Bit Reconfigurable Reflective Surfaces”
IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 2021 Due to a production error, in the original article [1], Fig. 5 was incorrectly published. We apologize for this error. The correct figure, with the corresponding caption, is shown below.
Bharath G. Kashyap +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Corrections to “Techno-Economic Optimization of the NbTi DTT Feeders”
IEEE Access, 2023 In the above article [1], an error in the units of measurement in Fig. 12 was identified. This error does not invalidate the discussion of the article findings and conclusions, as they were put in the form of comparison among different feeders. Fig.
Daniele Placido +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Assessing replication success: a taxonomy and systematic comparison of replication success measures for prospective replications [PDF]
Royal Society Open ScienceReplication studies are recognized as essential to the scientific process. Numerous measures have been developed to quantify replication success. Most measures were developed for post hoc replications, in which the primary study has been conducted and ...
Dennis Kondzic +6 more
doaj +1 more source
IEEE Access, 2023 In the above article [1], a technical error was present. This correction addresses the following error:
Petr Kadera +9 more
doaj +1 more source
Klasifikasi Kesalahan Siswa Kelas VII menggunakan Model KIAT tentang Materi Himpunan
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2019 : Purpose of this study was to classify an errors made by 7th grade students using the KIAT model of sets. Subjects in this study were 23 students. Procedure in this study is (1) makes a test question, (2) performs the validation, (3) performs the test, (
Wahyu Sulistio +2 more
doaj +1 more source