Results 11 to 20 of about 30,603,790 (296)
In this paper (Rubin, 2021), I consider two types of Type I error probability. The Neyman-Pearson Type I error rate refers to the maximum frequency of incorrectly rejecting a null hypothesis if a test was to be repeatedly reconducted on a series of different random samples that are all drawn from the exact same null population.
Mark Rubin
core +4 more sources
Type-I error rates of tests for different values of K and n.
Kwun Chuen Gary Chan (3641947) +3 more
core +2 more sources
Type I error in multiple comparison tests in analysis of variance
In a hypothesis test, a researcher initially fixes a type I error rate, that is, the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis given that it is true.
Josiane Rodrigues +3 more
doaj +1 more source
What is the proper way to apply the multiple comparison test? [PDF]
Multiple comparisons tests (MCTs) are performed several times on the mean of experimental conditions. When the null hypothesis is rejected in a validation, MCTs are performed when certain experimental conditions have a statistically significant mean ...
Sangseok Lee, Dong Kyu Lee
doaj +1 more source
Bu çal ışmada, çeşitli varyanslara sahip Beta 4,14 ve Ki-Kare 5 da ğı l ı m ı gösteren populasyonlardan al ı nan 3 veya 4 gruplu örneklerden yararlan ı larak F, Marascuilo, Welch, Brown-Forsythe ve Alexander-Govern test istatistiklerinin 100 000 ...
Mehmet Mendeş, Ensar Başpınar
doaj +1 more source
Which Robust Regression Technique Is Appropriate Under Violated Assumptions? A Simulation Study
Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression is widely employed for statistical prediction and theoretical explanation in psychology studies. However, OLS regression has a critical drawback: it becomes less accurate in the presence of outliers and non-random ...
Jaejin Kim, Johnson Ching-Hong Li
doaj +1 more source
In numerous investigations, whether practical or theoretical, a requirement for the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), is that the variances of the measured groups are equal.
B. Odoi +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Experiment-Wise Type I Error Control: A Focus on 2 × 2 Designs
Factorial designs are common in psychology research. But they are nearly always used without control of the experiment-wise Type I error rate (EWER), perhaps because of a lack of awareness about viable procedures for that purpose and perhaps also because
Andrew V. Frane
doaj +1 more source
Type I error at nominal level α = 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 for each scenario (see S8 Table) for our 4 ensemble methods and 59 state-of-the-art methods. Evolution of type I error: the difference between two experiments.
Miikka Vikkula (33969) +3 more
core +1 more source
Summary table of nine type I error experiments evaluated at three alpha levels (i.e. 0.05, 0.01, 0.001) for our 4 ensemble methods and 59 state-of-the-art methods. 27 type I error results generated per test.
Miikka Vikkula (33969) +3 more
core +1 more source

