Results 61 to 70 of about 10,489 (255)

Reflection, introspection, and book

open access: yesPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, Volume 111, Issue 3, Page 1136-1158, November 2025.
Abstract The much‐debated Reflection principle states that a coherent agent's credences must match their estimates for their future credences. Defenders claim that there are Dutch‐book arguments in its favor, putting it on the same normative footing as probabilistic coherence.
Kevin J. S. Zollman, Kevin Dorst
wiley   +1 more source

Models, truth and realism: assessing Bas van Fraassen's views on scientific representation

open access: yesManuscrito, 2011
This paper is devoted to an analysis of some aspects of Bas van Fraassen's views on representation. While I agree with most of his claims, I disagree on the following three issues.
Michel Ghins
doaj   +1 more source

The “Positive Argument” for Constructive Empiricism and Inference to the Best Explanation [PDF]

open access: yes, 2018
In this paper, I argue that the “positive argument” for Constructive Empiricism (CE), according to which CE “makes better sense of science, and of scientific activity, than realism does” (van Fraassen 1980, 73), is an Inference to the Best Explanation ...
Mizrahi, Moti
core   +1 more source

Armstrong on Probabilistic Laws of Nature [PDF]

open access: yes, 2017
D. M. Armstrong famously claims that deterministic laws of nature are contingent relations between universals and that his account can also be straightforwardly extended to irreducibly probabilistic laws of nature.
Hartman, Robert J., Jacobs, Jonathan D.
core   +1 more source

A Coherence Theory of Jurisprudence in the Spirit of Jhering: A Restatement, Update, and Defence of Jhering’s Early Methodology

open access: yesRatio Juris, Volume 38, Issue 3, Page 198-235, November 2025.
Abstract This essay revisits the early methodology of Rudolph von Jhering. It has often been dismissed due to its heavy metaphysics, unwieldy presentation, and alleged neglect of teleology. But a charitable reconstruction in contemporary terms reveals a coherence theory of jurisprudence that is in many ways superior to current coherence accounts.
Pascal Felix Meier
wiley   +1 more source

How to save van Fraassen’s own antirealism: a modest proposal

open access: yesPerspectiva Filosófica, 2020
Bas van Fraassen’s antirealist view of science and its aim, constructive empiricism, notoriously rests upon a distinction between observable and unobservable entities.
Alessio Gava
doaj   +1 more source

Empiricism, Stances, And The Problem Of Voluntarism [PDF]

open access: yes, 2011
Classical empiricism leads to notorious problems having to do with the (at least prima facie) lack of an acceptable empiricist justification of empiricism itself. Bas van Fraassen claims that his idea of the empirical stance can deal with such problems.
Baumann, Peter
core   +1 more source

Empirical adequacy and scientific discovery [PDF]

open access: yes, 2008
O presente trabalho busca mostrar que o empirismo construtivo de Bas van Fraassen, segundo enunciado em sua obra The Scientific Image, conduz a dificuldades consideráveis em filosofia da ciência.
Simon, Samuel
core   +3 more sources

How do you assert a graph? Towards an account of depictions in scientific testimony

open access: yesNoûs, Volume 59, Issue 3, Page 678-699, September 2025.
Abstract I extend the literature on norms of assertion to the ubiquitous use of graphs in scientific papers and presentations, which I term “graphical testimony.” On my account, the testimonial presentation of a graph involves commitment to both (a) the in‐context reliability of the graph's framing devices and (b) the perspective‐relative accuracy of ...
Corey Dethier
wiley   +1 more source

Rational Slack and Doxastic Grain

open access: yesPacific Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 106, Issue 3, Page 173-185, September 2025.
ABSTRACT This paper argues for granular permissivism, roughly the view that evidence is sometimes permissive between doxastic attitudes at different levels of grain. The argument identifies three sources of rational slack between granularly differing doxastic states: doxastic tidiness, safety, and evidential responsiveness.
Bradford Saad
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy