Results 291 to 300 of about 912,078 (328)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2018
My doctor told me I shouldn’t work out until I’m in better shape. I told him, “All right; don’t send me a bill until I pay you.”
Wiebke Klingemann +2 more
+4 more sources
My doctor told me I shouldn’t work out until I’m in better shape. I told him, “All right; don’t send me a bill until I pay you.”
Wiebke Klingemann +2 more
+4 more sources
Framing Influences Willingness to Pay but Not Willingness to Accept
Journal of Marketing Research, 2013The authors show, with real and hypothetical payoffs, that consumers are willing to pay substantially less for a risky prospect when it is called a “lottery ticket,” “raffle,” “coin flip,” or “gamble” than when it is labeled a “gift certificate” or “voucher.” Willingness to accept, in contrast, is not affected by these frames.
Yang, Yang +2 more
openaire +1 more source
2014
The valuation of health in monetary terms can be estimated by observing real choices or by eliciting willingness to pay (WTP) through presentation of hypothetical choices to respondents (contingent valuation). Contingent valuation is commonly used in other areas of the public sector and its use is growing in health. In this article, the authors outline
Baker R +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
The valuation of health in monetary terms can be estimated by observing real choices or by eliciting willingness to pay (WTP) through presentation of hypothetical choices to respondents (contingent valuation). Contingent valuation is commonly used in other areas of the public sector and its use is growing in health. In this article, the authors outline
Baker R +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
PharmacoEconomics, 1998
Despite renewed enthusiasm for the use of willingness to pay (WTP) in healthcare applications, there are still a lot of objections, resentment and scepticism regarding the desirability and feasibility of this technique. Objections can be classified into different categories: e.g.
openaire +2 more sources
Despite renewed enthusiasm for the use of willingness to pay (WTP) in healthcare applications, there are still a lot of objections, resentment and scepticism regarding the desirability and feasibility of this technique. Objections can be classified into different categories: e.g.
openaire +2 more sources
Overestimating Others’ Willingness to Pay
Journal of Consumer Research, 2012This article documents a widespread bias: a tendency to overestimate how much others will pay for goods. The effect may influence pricing and negotiations, which depend on accurate assessments of others’ valuations. It is also shown to underlie or interact with several widely researched behavioral phenomena, including egocentric empathy gaps, the ...
openaire +1 more source
Health Economics, 2003
Abstract A willingness to pay (WTP) per quality‐adjusted‐life year (QALY) of DKK 88 was estimated on the basis of elicited preferences for health states. The WTP per QALY estimate presented here differs considerably from that implied in contingent valuation studies, suggesting that WTP for reducing risk of death ...
openaire +5 more sources
Abstract A willingness to pay (WTP) per quality‐adjusted‐life year (QALY) of DKK 88 was estimated on the basis of elicited preferences for health states. The WTP per QALY estimate presented here differs considerably from that implied in contingent valuation studies, suggesting that WTP for reducing risk of death ...
openaire +5 more sources
Who Answers ‘Willingness to Pay’ Questions?
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2000Objectives: The objectives of this study were twofold. The first was to compare characteristics of responders and non-responders to a survey of women attending a bone mineral density screening service in Aberdeen concerned with the screening process which contained questions on attenders' willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to wait (WTW) for ...
R, Thomas, C, Donaldson, D, Torgerson
openaire +2 more sources
Willingness to Pay for Cancer Prevention
PharmacoEconomics, 2009Cancer inflicts great pain, burden and cost upon American society, and preventing cancer is important but not costless. The aim of this review was to explore the upper limits that American society is paying and appears willing to pay to prevent cancer, by enforced environmental regulations and implemented clinical practice guidelines.
Timothy L. Hunt +3 more
openaire +3 more sources