Results 21 to 30 of about 308 (147)
THE VIRTUOUS CITIZEN: REGIMES AND AUDIENCES
The purpose of the present paper is to sketch the possibility of an audience theory specific to virtue argumentation taking as a starting point what Aristotle has to say about political audiences in the context of specific political constitutions and ...
Iovan DREHE DREHE
doaj +1 more source
WHERE IS THE VALUE OF KNOWLEDGE? [PDF]
Knowledge is frequently said to be more valuable than true belief. Building upon this intuition, Zagzebski presents a challenge for definitions of knowledge.
Mateus Henriques Patrício
doaj +2 more sources
The Incoherent Root of Theological Fatalism
This paper begins with a standard argument for theological fatalism and unravels deeper dilemmas in stages, arriving at an argument that has nothing to do with divine foreknowledge or free will. I then focus on the problem of the incoherence or at least
Linda Zagzebski
doaj +1 more source
PODE A INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL SER UM AGENTE DE JUSTIFICAÇÃO EPISTÊMICA? [PDF]
RESUMO A difusão de Inteligência Artificial (IA) generativa na educação intensificou uma tensão epistemológica: podem sistemas artificiais atuar como agentes de justificação de crenças?
Bruno José Betti Galasso
doaj +2 more sources
A Critique on the Solution of Zakzewoski’s Virtue Responsibilism to the Gettier Problem
Edmund Gettier demonstrated that the traditional analysis of knowledge (as a justified true belief) is insufficient. Some philosophers have proposed that virtue epistemology holds the key to solving the Gettier problem.
Liu Caiqin
doaj +1 more source
Zagzebski, Authority, and Faith
Epistemic Authority is a mature work of a leading epistemologist and philosopher of religion (and metaphysician, too, but that character doesn’t feature in this story). It is a work primarily in epistemology with applications to religious epistemology. There are obvious applications of the notion of epistemic authority to philosophy of religion.
openaire +2 more sources
ABSTRACT Virtue epistemology has long struggled with the “Creditability Dilemma”: how can knowledge gained through deference be creditable to the knower if it primarily depends on others’ cognitive work? We propose a novel solution by developing a telic account of doxastic deference as a distinctive kind of social‐epistemic performance.
J. Adam Carter, Jesper Kallestrup
wiley +1 more source
ABSTRACT I argue that knowledge plays a distinctive role in psychological explanation that weaker epistemic states cannot because it is robust in the face of counterevidence in a way that they are not. Being robust in the face of counterevidence makes your belief robust in the face of counterargument.
Spencer Paulson
wiley +1 more source
External‐World Skepticism and the New Ethics of Belief
ABSTRACT External‐world skepticism challenges, among other things, the epistemic credentials of beliefs about other people. Some external‐world skeptics deny that I know my loved ones exist; some claim that my belief that my loved ones exist is epistemically impermissible. However, abandoning this belief would be highly unattractive.
James Fritz
wiley +1 more source
Lassen sich epistemische Tugenden als eine Art ethische Tugenden verstehen?
In diesem Beitrag geht es um die Frage, wie eine „intellektuelle Ethik“ aussehen müsste, in der der Begriff der Tugend eine zentrale Rolle spielt. Unter Tugendepistemolog:innen, die so einen Ansatz verfolgen, gibt es die Tendenz, epistemische Tugenden ...
Jens Kertscher
doaj +1 more source

