Results 11 to 20 of about 3,137,448 (307)
Nobel and novice: Author prominence affects peer review
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022 Significance Peer review is vital for research validation, but may be affected by “status bias,” the unequal treatment of papers written by prominent and less-well-known authors.
Juergen Huber +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Is the future of peer review automated?
BMC Research Notes, 2022 The rising rate of preprints and publications, combined with persistent inadequate reporting practices and problems with study design and execution, have strained the traditional peer review system.
Robert Schulz +15 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews
PLoS ONE, 2022 Peer Review is at the heart of scholarly communications and the cornerstone of scientific publishing. However, academia often criticizes the peer review system as non-transparent, biased, arbitrary, a flawed process at the heart of science, leading to ...
Tirthankar Ghosal +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2021 The amount and value of researchers’ peer review work is critical for academia and journal publishing. However, this labor is under-recognized, its magnitude is unknown, and alternative ways of organizing peer review labor are rarely considered.
B. Aczél +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Current concerns on journal article with preprint: Anesthesia and Pain Medicine perspectives [PDF]
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 2023 Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not yet been peer-reviewed. They have been widely adopted to promote the timely dissemination of research across many scientific fields.
Hyun Kang, Hyoung-Chul Oh
doaj +1 more source
Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals
Science Advances, 2021 No evidence that women are penalized in peer review and editorial processes, finds study on 145 journals in multiple disciplines. Scholarly journals are often blamed for a gender gap in publication rates, but it is unclear whether peer review and ...
F. Squazzoni +8 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Social Science Research Network, 2023 The emergence of peer-to-peer, collective or community self-consumption, and transactive energy concepts gives rise to new configurations of business models for local energy trading among a variety of actors.
J. M. Schwidtal +15 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Promoting research into peer review [PDF]
BMJ, 1994 One of the jobs of the editor of the BMJ is to sit on the editorial boards of the 18 special journals owned by the BMJ Publishing Group. At the meetings of these boards many questions are asked about the peer review process. What can be done to raise the standard of reviewing? How many reviewers should be used? How should they be selected?
openaire +3 more sources
Current concerns on journal article with preprint: perspectives [PDF]
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 2023 Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not yet been peer-reviewed. They have been widely adopted to promote the timely dissemination of research across many scientific fields.
Hyoung-Chul Oh, Hyun Kang
doaj +1 more source
Scientific peer review in the modern era: A comprehensive guide
Indian Journal of Rheumatology, 2022 The scientific peer review process involves scrutinizing the work of researchers by a panel of scientific experts who are selected by the journal to which they have submitted a manuscript.
Nimrat Kaur Sandhu +2 more
doaj +1 more source