Results 21 to 30 of about 3,137,448 (307)
Towards theorizing peer review
Quantitative Science Studies, 2021 Academic peer review is seriously undertheorized because peer review studies focus on discovering and confirming phenomena, such as biases, and are much less concerned with explaining, predicting, or controlling phenomena on a theoretical basis.
Sven E. Hug
semanticscholar +1 more source
A new forum for research on research integrity and peer review [PDF]
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2016 This editorial explains why we are launching Research Integrity and Peer Review, a new open-access journal that will provide a home to research on ethics, reporting, and evaluation of research. We discuss how the idea to launch this journal came about and identify the gaps in knowledge where we would like to encourage more research and ...
Harriman, S +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
California Agriculture, 2004 We describe three creative collaborations between the California Sea Grant Extension Program (SGEP), the California Department of Fish and Game, the fishing industry and university researchers to improve marine fisheries management in ...
Christopher Dewees +2 more
doaj +1 more source
A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Design Elements
Educational Psychology Review, 2023 The growing number of peer assessment studies in the last decades created diverse design options for researchers and teachers to implement peer assessment.
M. Alqassab +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Foundations of a Framework for Peer-Reviewing the Research Flow [PDF]
, 2019 Presentation given at the IRCDL2019 conference in Pisa (31 Jan , 1 Feb 2019) - see: https://ircdl2019.isti.cnr.it. The work investigates on the role of peer review in the era of digital research and Open Science and presents the foundations of a framework for the representation of "peer-reviewable" research flows.
Bardi, Alessia +2 more
openaire +4 more sources
Triangulation of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Panel Peer Review Research
, 2011 More and more research grants worldwide are distributed based on decisions of review committees. But how do these peer review committees come to a decision and what affects decision-making processes when research programs are evaluated?
T. Klein, Meike Olbrecht
semanticscholar +1 more source
, 2020 This chapter aims to outline a process of school collaboration with peer review at its heart, conceived at UCL Institute of Education by David Godfrey and piloted by the authors for the first time in 2016/17 in London. We outline some of the learning that has resulted for participating school staff and reflect on what we have learned as facilitators ...
Godfrey, D, Spence-Thomas, K
openaire +3 more sources
Review of Peer Evaluation Research [PDF]
, 1978 Abstract : Peer evaluation research was reviewed from the three major perspectives of validity studies, methodology, and situational factors. Most of the research programs were conducted in the course of developing procedures for evaluating training groups (e.g., in Officer Candidate School, U.S. Military Academy, and Ranger course).
Ronald G. Downey, Paul J. Duffy
openaire +2 more sources
The acceptability of using a lottery to allocate research funding: a survey of applicants
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2020 Background The Health Research Council of New Zealand is the first major government funding agency to use a lottery to allocate research funding for their Explorer Grant scheme.
Mengyao Liu +5 more
doaj +1 more source
What makes an eLife paper in epidemiology and global health?
eLife, 2015 The best papers provide evidence that can be used to make changes that improve the health and lives of people around the world.
Mark Jit, Eduardo Franco, Prabhat Jha
doaj +1 more source