Results 71 to 80 of about 1,837,479 (139)
When the Person is the Argument: ad hominem in African American Argumentation
Affiliation: Philosophy, Fisk UniversityWithin this project, I examine textbooks and the scholarly conceptualizations of ad hominem, specifically circumstantial and tu quoque, to determine the argument's relevancy within African American ...
Henning, Tempest M.
core
On answering accusations in controversies [PDF]
, 2009 Accusations are a very frequent type of speech act both in everyday life and in formal controversies, and answering accusations is a sophisticated type of linguistic practice well worth analysing from a pragmatic point of view.
Fritz, Gerd
core
L'argument ad hominem politique est-il moral ? Le cas des débats télévisés
, 1998 By considering the example of ad hominem arguments formulated during Canadian federal and Québécois provincial elections, the paper deals with the ethics of this type of argumentation.
Gauthier, Gilles, Gilles Gauthier
core +1 more source
Lightening up on the Ad Hominem
, 2008 In all three of its manifestations, —abusive, circumstantial and tu quoque—the role of the ad hominem is to raise a doubt about the opposite party’s casemaking bona-fides.Provided that it is both presumptive and provisional, drawing such a conclusion is ...
John Woods, Woods, John
core +1 more source
Naturalizing Logic: a case study of the ad hominem and implicit bias [PDF]
, 2019 The fallacies, as traditionally conceived, are wrong ways of reasoning that nevertheless appear attractive to us. Recently, however, Woods (2013) has argued that they don’t merit such a title, and that what we take to be fallacies are instead largely ...
Ransom, Madeleine
core +1 more source
Argumentation in anonymous online discussions about decriminalising cannabis use. [PDF]
Nordisk Alkohol Nark, 2021 Hämäläinen L, Lahti E.
europepmc +1 more source
An article on "letter to the editor". [PDF]
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol, 2023 Pandarathodiyil AK +2 more
europepmc +1 more source
Argumentation schemes, fallacies, and evidence in politicians' argumentative tweets-A coded dataset. [PDF]
Data Brief, 2022 Macagno F.
europepmc +1 more source
Ad hominem arguments against parlamentarians
Denne oppgaven handler om bruk av personargumenter mot stortingspolitikere. Argumentasjonsteoretisk regnes personargumenter vanligvis som feilslutninger, fordi de forkaster en uttalelse på grunn av den som uttaler seg.
Ulvenes, Åsmund
core