Results 61 to 70 of about 16,929 (183)
Notes sur le modèle occidental de l’argumentation au prisme de l’argumentation chinoise
Argumentation et Analyse du DiscoursThis article interrogates the Western “confrontational” model of argumentation, discourse/counter-discourse, and a possible alternative to the Toulminian model, through the prism of Chinese argumentation. It is based on a selection of translated extracts
Christian Plantin
doaj +1 more source
La pseudo-fallacia dell’argumentum (sub sub-genus) “ad hominem” quale enzima retoricamente onto-teleo-t(etico) per / dell’oratore [PDF]
The paper provides to give a minimal contribution about a typical argumentation scheme which called "ad hominem". Especially, this mode of conduct a dialogue and arguing towards an opponent has been revisited by not long past approaches on Argumentation ...
Cavinato, Francesco
core
Metaphilosophy, Volume 56, Issue 3-4, Page 407-422, July 2025.Abstract Can you change sex? Can you change the meaning of the concept “sex”? Does changing “sex” make changing sex possible? Would changing “sex” to make changing sex not only possible but also easy be a good thing? Might it, as some argue, help us bring about a new way of thinking and of acting that liberates us from the logic of heteronormativity ...
Neil Gascoigne
wiley +1 more source
Anscombe on the shallowness of consequentialism
European Journal of Philosophy, Volume 33, Issue 2, Page 737-747, June 2025.Abstract This paper is divided into two parts. In the first I outline and defend Elizabeth Anscombe's claim that consequentialism is a shallow philosophy by considering how two contemporary consequentialists reach opposing but equally outlandish moral conclusions on a matter as fundamental as whether it is good or bad that the human race continues.
Craig Taylor
wiley +1 more source
Ultra-processed foods: a concept in need of revision to avoid targeting healthful and sustainable plant-based foods. [PDF]
Public Health Nutr, 2023 Messina MJ +4 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Witness Impeachment in Cross-Examination Using Ad Hominem Argumentation [PDF]
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2018 Abstract This paper combines methods of argumentation theory and artificial intelligence to extend existing work on the dialectical structure of crossexamination. The existing method used conflict diagrams to search for inconsistent statements in the testimony of a witness.
openaire +2 more sources
Le dialogue de La surprise de l’amour entre dissensus et consensus [PDF]
, 2005 Dans une perspective de « rhétorique interactionnelle » et de « dialectique éristique » aux frontières confondues, cette recherche se propose d’examiner un cas constitué par le dialogue des personnages de La ...
Elewa, Maha
core +1 more source
Intellectual humility and argumentation [PDF]
, 2020 In this chapter I argue that intellectual humility is related to argumentation in several distinct but mutually supporting ways. I begin by drawing connections between humility and two topics of long-standing importance to the evaluation of informal ...
Aberdein, Andrew
core
The Ad Hominem argument against \u27Knowledge is true belief\u27: a reply to Martens [PDF]
, 2011 In this article I will detail the short-comings that exist in the cognitive account of the emotion objectless fear, principally, though not exclusively, as it is presented in the work of William Lyons.
Scott F. Aikin
core +1 more source