Results 111 to 120 of about 9,659 (165)

Assessing methodological quality of systematic reviews with meta-analysis about clinical pharmacy services: A sensitivity analysis of AMSTAR-2

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Systematic reviews are critical for evidence-based healthcare decisions, but their validity depends on the quality of conduct and reporting. AMSTAR-2, a widely used tool for assessing the quality of systematic reviews, identifies seven critical domains influencing review validity, although its developers recommend flexibility in prioritizing these ...
Inajara Rotta, Joyce A. Diniz, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

An overview of systematic reviews of acupuncture for Parkinson’s disease

Frontiers in Neuroscience
BackgroundMany systematic reviews (SRs) have reported the efficacy of acupuncture in improving Parkinson’s disease (PD), but the quality of evidence is unknown. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively summarize and objectively evaluate the evidence
Hua Xue, Hong-xian He, Dan Wu, Wen-hui Fan, Ya-xin Li   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Reply to "Comments on 'Critically Low Confidence in the Results Produced by Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews: An AMSTAR-2 Evaluation From 4 Spine Journals' by Dettori et al". [PDF]

Global Spine J, 2020
Dettori JR, Skelly AC, Brodt ED.
europepmc   +1 more source

Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews Performed As An Undergraduate thesis in A Peruvian University: A Systematic Review

Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Rafael Pichardo-Rodriguez,1 Valeria Altuna-Moscoso,1 Karen Aviles-Antezana,1 Alondra Lorena Cahuana-Mendoza,1 Antonio André Challco Alvarado,1 Cristhian Gonzales-Rospigliosi,1 Shirley Oscco-Coila,1 Enzo Rafael-Tarazona,1 Marcos Saavedra-Velasco,1 Liz ...
Pichardo-Rodriguez R, Altuna-Moscoso V, Aviles-Antezana K, Cahuana-Mendoza AL, Challco Alvarado AA, Gonzales-Rospigliosi C, Oscco-Coila S, Rafael-Tarazona E, Saavedra-Velasco M, Cordova-Cueva L, De La Cruz-Vargas JA, Munayco-Guillen F, García-Perdomo HA   +12 more
doaj  

Overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional analysis using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool. [PDF]

Braz J Phys Ther, 2020
Almeida MO, Yamato TP, Parreira PDCS, Costa LOP, Kamper S, Saragiotto BT.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Laparoscopic Surgery During Pregnancy: A Meta-Review and Quality Analysis Using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 Instrument. [PDF]

Cureus
Pantelis AG, Machairiotis N, Stavros S, Potiris A, Karampitsakos T, Lapatsanis DP, Drakakis P.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

High rates of spin bias in systematic reviews regarding anterior cervical discectomy and fusion <i>vs.</i> posterior cervical foraminotomy: a systematic review. [PDF]

J Spine Surg
Rusu D, Olurin J, Lindgren A, Mohty N, Avetisian H, Abdou MA, Wang JC, Hah RJ, Alluri RK.   +8 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Systematic Reviews: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Meta-Research Study. [PDF]

JMIR Res Protoc
Jay M, Morgan M, Straus SE, Wilson E, Sutradhar R, Yu C, Gotlib Conn L, Dharma C, Lipscombe L, Eskander A.   +9 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Exercise-based interventions for sarcopenic obesity in middle-aged and older adults: an umbrella review of systematic reviews with pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses. [PDF]

Front Nutr
Ma X, Sun G, Liu C, Yan X, Liang W, Ma Z.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Identification and Assessment of Systematic Reviews for Evidence-Based Guideline Recommendations on Follow-Up of Preterm Born Children: A Mapping Review. [PDF]

Acta Paediatr
Kaiser G, Kayser M, Babel M, Wohlleben J, Weibel S, Spiegler J.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source