Results 131 to 140 of about 9,659 (165)

Influenza vaccination and cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes in high-risk populations: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes. [PDF]

Front Immunol
Jin C, Zhang Y, Wang B, Hua P.
europepmc   +1 more source

The Effectiveness of Probiotics in Psoriasis: An Umbrella Review. [PDF]

J Nutr Metab
Ayuningtyas M, Farapti F, Hajar SS.
europepmc   +1 more source

Gait Retraining for Patellofemoral Pain in Runners: An Umbrella Review of Clinical and Biomechanical Evidence. [PDF]

Sports Med Open
Petri AC, Martins TB, Martins TB, de Souza J, Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Okubo R.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Publication lag in interventional, RCT-based meta-analyses within top-tier general medical journals and the CDSR: a protocol for a meta-epidemiological study. [PDF]

Front Med (Lausanne)
Song J, Wang Q, Zhao C, Li L, Kang D.
europepmc   +1 more source

Self-medication with psychedelics: a scoping review and narrative synthesis of review-level evidence. [PDF]

Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm
Shiju S, Tirumala R, Marseille E.
europepmc   +1 more source

Mapping the evidence on stillbirth prevention across the reproductive continuum: an umbrella review. [PDF]

BMJ Open
Gadapani Pathak B, Vats P, Manna S, Yadav S, Bhatt A, Mukherjee R, Patil R, Dayma G, Mazumder S.   +8 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Risk of Bias in Rapid Reviews: Omission, Adaptation and Transparency

Potter R, Kenny RP, Inskip A, Oliver EJ, Ray D, Norman G.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2019
The objectives of this study were to determine the interrater reliability (IRR) of assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) 2 for reviews of pharmacological or psychological interventions for the treatment of major depression, to compare it to that of AMSTAR and risk of bias in systematic reviews (ROBIS), and to assess the convergent validity
Dawid Pieper, Katja Matthias, Robert Lorenz   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Authors should clearly report how they derived the overall rating when applying AMSTAR 2—a cross-sectional study

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (SRs) 2 (AMSTAR 2) allows for deriving the overall confidence in an SR. We investigated how authors derived the overall confidence rating and whether different schemes lead to different results.We compared three different schemes (original 7-item scheme, a self-developed 5-item scheme, and the AMSTAR Web ...
Tanja Rombey, Simone Freitag, Dawid Pieper   +2 more
exaly   +4 more sources