Results 141 to 150 of about 9,659 (165)

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention in dentistry published between 2019-2020 using the AMSTAR 2 tool

Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2022
Introduction The number of systematic reviews (SRs) in dentistry published each year has grown considerably, and they have been essential in clinical decision-making and health policy.Objective The objective is to critically appraise SRs of intervention in dentistry using the 'A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2' (AMSTAR 2) tool published
Patrícia, Pauletto, Helena, Polmann, Jéssica Conti, Réus, Júlia Meller Dias, de Oliveira, Débora, Chaves, Karyn, Lehmkuhl, Carla, Massignan, Cristine Miron, Stefani, Carolina Castro, Martins, Carlos, Flores-Mir, Graziela, De Luca Canto   +10 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Methodological use and report of AMSTAR 2: a cross-sectional study

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
This study aimed to analyze the reporting and methodology approach used for the methodological assessment of SRs using AMSTAR 2.We conducted a cross-sectional meta-research study. We included full reports of scholarly articles that applied AMSTAR 2 to assess systematic reviews or other evidence syntheses. Eligible studies were published between January
Ruzica Bojcic, Mate Todoric, Mirko Gabelica, Sara Pintur, Ilija David Plosnic, Dawid Pieper, Livia Puljak   +6 more
openaire   +2 more sources

amstar2Vis: An R package for presenting the critical appraisal of systematic reviews based on AMSTAR 2 tool

2023
The amstar2Vis package intends to facilitate the production of publication-ready tables and figures for the AMSTAR 2 tool.
Haidich, Anna Bettina, Bouras, Emmanouil, Bougioukas, Konstantinos I., Pamporis, Konstantinos, Karakasis, Paschalis   +4 more
openaire   +1 more source

Application of AMSTAR 2 in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders: A cross-sectional study

2020
The main aim of this project is to provide a detailed description of the application of AMSTAR 2, including the methods for deriving or computing of the overall confidence rating in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders.
Karina Karolina De Santis, Robert C Lorenz, Katja Matthias   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Authors should also report the support for judgment when applying AMSTAR 2

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
Juan Victor Ariel Franco, Nicolas Meza
openaire   +2 more sources

PGI21 Quality Assessment of Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis: Comparison of AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS

Value in Health, 2021
V. Belekar, U.S. Lakkakula, A. Aggarwal, R. Thode, G.S. Solanki, R. Goyal   +5 more
openaire   +1 more source

The Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis of Athlete Research in Korea : Application of AMSTAR 2 Guideline

The Korea Journal of Sport, 2023
Sang-Jin Yoon, Hun Jung, Kwang-Woo Nam
openaire   +1 more source

Reply to letter to the editor by Franco et al. AMSTAR 2 overall confidence rating: A call for even more transparency

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
Robert C. Lorenz, Dawid Pieper, Tanja Rombey, Anja Jacobs, Olesja Rissling, Simone Freitag, Katja Matthias   +6 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews on the prevalence of malnutrition in patients with cardiovascular diseases using AMSTAR-2

Introduction: Malnutrition is common among patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and estimates of its prevalence are essential to guide screening, diagnosis, and nutritional management strategies. Systematic reviews play a key role in this process by synthesizing evidence that informs clinical guidelines and practice.
Zucatti, Kelly Pozzer, Manoela Viel Paravisi   +1 more
openaire   +1 more source

Methodological Quality Evaluation of a Systematic Review of Dementia Elderly Rehabilitation Study in Korea Applying AMSTAR-2

The Journal of Next-generation Convergence Technology Association, 2022
Seung-il Song, Hyeon Taek Hong, Hwan Kim
openaire   +1 more source