Results 161 to 170 of about 11,780 (189)

A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2019
The objectives of this study were to determine the interrater reliability (IRR) of assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) 2 for reviews of pharmacological or psychological interventions for the treatment of major depression, to compare it to that of AMSTAR and risk of bias in systematic reviews (ROBIS), and to assess the convergent validity
Robert C Lorenz, Katja Matthias, Dawid Pieper   +2 more
exaly   +4 more sources

Assessment of quality of reporting and methodology in systematic reviews of moxibustion for chronic diseases using PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2

Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Moxibustion is a simple and low-cost technique for chronic diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of reports and methodologies of systematic reviews (SRs) related to the treatment of chronic diseases with moxibustion.Six databases were searched to identify moxibustion SRs for the treatment of chronic diseases.
Rong Chen, Xu Zhou, Guihua Deng, Shuqing Li, Linhui Li   +4 more
exaly   +5 more sources

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Authors should clearly report how they derived the overall rating when applying AMSTAR 2—a cross-sectional study

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (SRs) 2 (AMSTAR 2) allows for deriving the overall confidence in an SR. We investigated how authors derived the overall confidence rating and whether different schemes lead to different results.We compared three different schemes (original 7-item scheme, a self-developed 5-item scheme, and the AMSTAR Web ...
Dawid Pieper, Robert C Lorenz, Tanja Rombey   +2 more
exaly   +4 more sources

Methodological use and report of AMSTAR 2: a cross-sectional study

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
This study aimed to analyze the reporting and methodology approach used for the methodological assessment of SRs using AMSTAR 2.We conducted a cross-sectional meta-research study. We included full reports of scholarly articles that applied AMSTAR 2 to assess systematic reviews or other evidence syntheses. Eligible studies were published between January
Ruzica Bojcic, Mate Todoric, Mirko Gabelica, Sara Pintur, Ilija David Plosnic, Dawid Pieper, Livia Puljak   +6 more
openaire   +2 more sources

The AMSTAR 2 publication lacks explicit instructions on how to assess the appropriateness of statistical methods (item 11) and publication bias (item 15) and does not reflect advances in meta-analysis [PDF]

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Background and Objectives As the quantity of published systematic reviews has increased substantially over the years, concerns about the methodological quality of this growing body of literature have been validly raised.
Loukia M Spineli
exaly   +2 more sources

Authors should also report the support for judgment when applying AMSTAR 2

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
Juan Victor Ariel Franco, Nicolas Meza
openaire   +2 more sources

PGI21 Quality Assessment of Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis: Comparison of AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS

Value in Health, 2021
V. Belekar, U.S. Lakkakula, A. Aggarwal, R. Thode, G.S. Solanki, R. Goyal   +5 more
openaire   +1 more source

The Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis of Athlete Research in Korea : Application of AMSTAR 2 Guideline

The Korea Journal of Sport, 2023
Sang-Jin Yoon, Hun Jung, Kwang-Woo Nam
openaire   +1 more source

Reply to letter to the editor by Franco et al. AMSTAR 2 overall confidence rating: A call for even more transparency

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
Robert C. Lorenz, Dawid Pieper, Tanja Rombey, Anja Jacobs, Olesja Rissling, Simone Freitag, Katja Matthias   +6 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews on the prevalence of malnutrition in patients with cardiovascular diseases using AMSTAR-2

Introduction: Malnutrition is common among patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and estimates of its prevalence are essential to guide screening, diagnosis, and nutritional management strategies. Systematic reviews play a key role in this process by synthesizing evidence that informs clinical guidelines and practice.
Zucatti, Kelly Pozzer, Manoela Viel Paravisi   +1 more
openaire   +1 more source