Results 101 to 110 of about 9,618 (129)

Risk of Bias in Rapid Reviews: Omission, Adaptation and Transparency

Potter R, Kenny RP, Inskip A, Oliver EJ, Ray D, Norman G.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2019
The objectives of this study were to determine the interrater reliability (IRR) of assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) 2 for reviews of pharmacological or psychological interventions for the treatment of major depression, to compare it to that of AMSTAR and risk of bias in systematic reviews (ROBIS), and to assess the convergent validity
Dawid Pieper, Katja Matthias, Robert Lorenz   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Qualitätsbewertung systematischer Reviews: Interrater-Reliabilität des neuen AMSTAR 2 im Vergleich zu AMSTAR und ROBIS

2018
Hintergrund: Es gibt diverse Bewertungsinstrumente zur Qualitätsbewertung systematischer Reviews (SR), jedoch bislang keinen Konsens über ein zu verwendendes Instrument. AMSTAR hat sich zwar als eines der meist verwendeten Instrumente etabliert, jedoch wurde wiederholt kritisiert, dass der[zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene ...
Lorenz, R, Matthias, K, Pieper, D, Wegewitz, U, Morche, J, Nocon, M, Rissling, O, Schirm, J, Jacobs, A   +8 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention in dentistry published between 2019-2020 using the AMSTAR 2 tool

Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2022
Introduction The number of systematic reviews (SRs) in dentistry published each year has grown considerably, and they have been essential in clinical decision-making and health policy.Objective The objective is to critically appraise SRs of intervention in dentistry using the 'A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2' (AMSTAR 2) tool published
Patrícia, Pauletto, Helena, Polmann, Jéssica Conti, Réus, Júlia Meller Dias, de Oliveira, Débora, Chaves, Karyn, Lehmkuhl, Carla, Massignan, Cristine Miron, Stefani, Carolina Castro, Martins, Carlos, Flores-Mir, Graziela, De Luca Canto   +10 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Methodological use and report of AMSTAR 2: a cross-sectional study

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
This study aimed to analyze the reporting and methodology approach used for the methodological assessment of SRs using AMSTAR 2.We conducted a cross-sectional meta-research study. We included full reports of scholarly articles that applied AMSTAR 2 to assess systematic reviews or other evidence syntheses. Eligible studies were published between January
Ruzica Bojcic, Mate Todoric, Mirko Gabelica, Sara Pintur, Ilija David Plosnic, Dawid Pieper, Livia Puljak   +6 more
openaire   +2 more sources

amstar2Vis: An R package for presenting the critical appraisal of systematic reviews based on AMSTAR 2 tool

2023
The amstar2Vis package intends to facilitate the production of publication-ready tables and figures for the AMSTAR 2 tool.
Haidich, Anna Bettina, Bouras, Emmanouil, Bougioukas, Konstantinos I., Pamporis, Konstantinos, Karakasis, Paschalis   +4 more
openaire   +1 more source

amstar2Vis: An R package for presenting the critical appraisal of systematic reviews based on the items of AMSTAR 2

Research Synthesis Methods
AbstractSystematic reviews (SRs) have an important role in the healthcare decision‐making practice. Assessing the overall confidence in the results of SRs using quality assessment tools, such as “A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2” (AMSTAR 2), is crucial since not all SRs are conducted using the most rigorous methods. In this article, we
Konstantinos I. Bougioukas, Paschalis Karakasis, Konstantinos Pamporis, Emmanouil Bouras, Anna‐Bettina Haidich   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Application of AMSTAR 2 in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders: A cross-sectional study

2020
The main aim of this project is to provide a detailed description of the application of AMSTAR 2, including the methods for deriving or computing of the overall confidence rating in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders.
Karina Karolina De Santis, Robert C Lorenz, Katja Matthias   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Authors should also report the support for judgment when applying AMSTAR 2

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
Juan Victor Ariel Franco, Nicolas Meza
openaire   +2 more sources