Results 121 to 130 of about 12,174 (193)

An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS) [PDF]

open access: yes, 2011
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews are not an assembly of anecdotes but a distillation of current best available evidence on a particular topic and as such have an important role to play in evidence-based healthcare.
Sharif, Mohammad Owaise   +8 more
core   +1 more source

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Health Outcomes: an Umbrella review of Meta‐Analyses

open access: yesObesity Reviews, Volume 27, Issue 7, July 2026.
ABSTRACT Introduction This study systematically synthesized evidence on adverse health outcomes related to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) via an umbrella review with integrated meta‐analyses. Methods The search covered publications from the database (PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Embase, and CINAHL) inception to August 12, 2024. Meta‐analyses of
Jiseung Kang   +14 more
wiley   +1 more source

AMSTAR 2 overall confidence rating [PDF]

open access: yesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2019
Lorenz, Robert C. (Dr. rer. nat.)   +9 more
openaire   +3 more sources

The efficacy of acupuncture for trigeminal neuralgia: an overview of systematic reviews

open access: yesFrontiers in Neurology
BackgroundMany systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analysis (MAs) have reported the efficacy of acupuncture treatment for primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN), but the quality of evidence is unknown and therefore needs to be evaluated comprehensively ...
Hong-xian He   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

PND14 QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF META-ANALYSES ON INTERVENTIONS FOR BELL'S PALSY USING AMSTAR 2 [PDF]

open access: yesValue in Health, 2020
R.A. Khan   +4 more
openaire   +1 more source

Comparison between two tools assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews: ReMarQ and AMSTAR 2

open access: yesClinical and Public Health Guidelines
AbstractSeveral tools are available for assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews. The ReMarQ tool – centred on the assessment of the reporting methodological quality of systematic reviews – comprises 26 dichotomous items and does not require clinical or background knowledge of the review topic for its application.
Manuel Marques‐Cruz   +5 more
openaire   +1 more source

Reporting Bias Is Highly Prevalent in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Related to Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

open access: yesArthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
Purpose: To analyze reporting bias in the form of spin present in systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR).
Kenneth T. Nguyen, B.S.   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Traduction franco-canadienne de l’Assessment of Systematic Reviews Revised (AMSTAR 2) : validation transculturelle et fidélité interjuges. [PDF]

open access: yesPhysiother Can, 2022
Flowers H   +33 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Additional file 2: of Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines

open access: yes, 2016
Included and Excluded Study Lists. Details the sample of rapid reviews included in this manuscript and reports excluded studies. (DOCX 27Â kb)
Kelly, Shannon   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Evaluating the Characteristics, Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain by Using the Veritas Plot

open access: yesJournal of Pain Research, 2020
Fan Huang,1,* Mingwang Qiu,2,* Siyi Zhao,1,* Lin Dai,2 Yanpeng Xu,2 Yunying Yang,2 Liming Lu,2 Rusong Guo,1,3 Qiang Tian,1,3 Zhiyong Fan,1,3 Shan Wu1,3 1The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405 ...
Huang F   +10 more
doaj  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy