Results 131 to 140 of about 12,174 (193)

Methodological quality of systematic reviews based on AMSTAR criteria^1,2.

, 2017
Methodological quality of systematic reviews based on AMSTAR criteria1,2.
Ben Gerber (3805255), Guy Paré (3805252), Spyros Kitsiou (3805249), Mirou Jaana (3805246)   +3 more
core   +1 more source

An overview of systematic reviews of acupuncture for Parkinson’s disease

Frontiers in Neuroscience
BackgroundMany systematic reviews (SRs) have reported the efficacy of acupuncture in improving Parkinson’s disease (PD), but the quality of evidence is unknown. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively summarize and objectively evaluate the evidence
Hua Xue, Hong-xian He, Dan Wu, Wen-hui Fan, Ya-xin Li   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Reaching for the stars – rating the quality of systematic reviews with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews ( AMSTAR ) 2 [PDF]

BJU International, 2018
Jae Hung, Jung, Philipp, Dahm
openaire   +2 more sources

Critical analysis of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of antibiotics in third molar surgeries using AMSTAR 2. [PDF]

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 2020
Chugh A, Patnana AK, Kumar P, Chugh VK, Khera D, Singh S.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Reply to "Comments on 'Critically Low Confidence in the Results Produced by Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews: An AMSTAR-2 Evaluation From 4 Spine Journals' by Dettori et al". [PDF]

Global Spine J, 2020
Dettori JR, Skelly AC, Brodt ED.
europepmc   +1 more source

AMSTAR 2 assessments of all SRs.

BackgroundObservational studies form the foundation of Long COVID knowledge, however combining data from Long COVID observational studies has multiple methodological challenges. This umbrella review synthesizes estimates of Long COVID prevalence and risk
Miao Jenny Hua (18495737), Deborah Porterfield (7248830), Gisela Butera (18175448), Oluwaseun Akinyemi (7868258)   +3 more
core   +1 more source

Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews Cross-Referenced by the European Association of Urology (EAU) 2023 Guidelines on Prostate Cancer with AMSTAR 2 tool

In this project, we aim to utilise the AMSTAR 2 tool to critically appraise the systematic reviews of intervention cross-referenced in the 2023 EAU Prostate Cancer ...
Abhilash Cheriyan, Muhammad Imran Omar, Alina Imran, Aqeel AlEbraheem, Steven MacLennan   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews Performed As An Undergraduate thesis in A Peruvian University: A Systematic Review

Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Rafael Pichardo-Rodriguez,1 Valeria Altuna-Moscoso,1 Karen Aviles-Antezana,1 Alondra Lorena Cahuana-Mendoza,1 Antonio André Challco Alvarado,1 Cristhian Gonzales-Rospigliosi,1 Shirley Oscco-Coila,1 Enzo Rafael-Tarazona,1 Marcos Saavedra-Velasco,1 Liz ...
Pichardo-Rodriguez R, Altuna-Moscoso V, Aviles-Antezana K, Cahuana-Mendoza AL, Challco Alvarado AA, Gonzales-Rospigliosi C, Oscco-Coila S, Rafael-Tarazona E, Saavedra-Velasco M, Cordova-Cueva L, De La Cruz-Vargas JA, Munayco-Guillen F, García-Perdomo HA   +12 more
doaj  

Quality of Systematic Reviews with Network Meta-Analyses on JAK Inhibitors in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Application of the AMSTAR 2 Scale. [PDF]

J Clin Med
Ramalho B, Penedones A, Mendes D, Alves C.   +3 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Laparoscopic Surgery During Pregnancy: A Meta-Review and Quality Analysis Using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 Instrument. [PDF]

Cureus
Pantelis AG, Machairiotis N, Stavros S, Potiris A, Karampitsakos T, Lapatsanis DP, Drakakis P.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source