Results 161 to 170 of about 12,174 (193)
Beyond
openaire +1 more source
Risk of Bias in Rapid Reviews: Omission, Adaptation and Transparency
Potter R +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool
The objectives of this study were to determine the interrater reliability (IRR) of assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) 2 for reviews of pharmacological or psychological interventions for the treatment of major depression, to compare it to that of AMSTAR and risk of bias in systematic reviews (ROBIS), and to assess the convergent validity
Robert C Lorenz +2 more
exaly +4 more sources
Hintergrund: Es gibt diverse Bewertungsinstrumente zur Qualitätsbewertung systematischer Reviews (SR), jedoch bislang keinen Konsens über ein zu verwendendes Instrument. AMSTAR hat sich zwar als eines der meist verwendeten Instrumente etabliert, jedoch wurde wiederholt kritisiert, dass der[zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene ...
Lorenz, R +8 more
openaire +3 more sources
Introduction The number of systematic reviews (SRs) in dentistry published each year has grown considerably, and they have been essential in clinical decision-making and health policy.Objective The objective is to critically appraise SRs of intervention in dentistry using the 'A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2' (AMSTAR 2) tool published
Patrícia, Pauletto +10 more
openaire +3 more sources
The amstar2Vis package intends to facilitate the production of publication-ready tables and figures for the AMSTAR 2 tool.
Haidich, Anna Bettina +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
The main aim of this project is to provide a detailed description of the application of AMSTAR 2, including the methods for deriving or computing of the overall confidence rating in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders.
Lorenz, Robert C +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews [PDF]
Objective: Our purpose was to measure the agreement, reliability, construct validity, and feasibility of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). Study Design and Setting: We randomly selected 30 systematic reviews from a database.
Candyce Hamel +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Methodological use and report of AMSTAR 2: a cross-sectional study
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyThis study aimed to analyze the reporting and methodology approach used for the methodological assessment of SRs using AMSTAR 2.We conducted a cross-sectional meta-research study. We included full reports of scholarly articles that applied AMSTAR 2 to assess systematic reviews or other evidence syntheses. Eligible studies were published between January
Ruzica Bojcic +6 more
openaire +2 more sources

