Results 171 to 180 of about 12,174 (193)

amstar2Vis: An R package for presenting the critical appraisal of systematic reviews based on the items of AMSTAR 2

Research Synthesis Methods
AbstractSystematic reviews (SRs) have an important role in the healthcare decision‐making practice. Assessing the overall confidence in the results of SRs using quality assessment tools, such as “A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2” (AMSTAR 2), is crucial since not all SRs are conducted using the most rigorous methods. In this article, we
Konstantinos I. Bougioukas, Paschalis Karakasis, Konstantinos Pamporis, Emmanouil Bouras, Anna‐Bettina Haidich   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Authors should also report the support for judgment when applying AMSTAR 2

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
Juan Victor Ariel Franco, Nicolas Meza
openaire   +2 more sources

PGI21 Quality Assessment of Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis: Comparison of AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS

Value in Health, 2021
V. Belekar, U.S. Lakkakula, A. Aggarwal, R. Thode, G.S. Solanki, R. Goyal   +5 more
openaire   +1 more source

Authors should clearly report how they derived the overall rating when applying AMSTAR 2—a cross-sectional study

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
Dawid Pieper, Robert C Lorenz, Tanja Rombey   +2 more
exaly  

The Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis of Athlete Research in Korea : Application of AMSTAR 2 Guideline

The Korea Journal of Sport, 2023
Sang-Jin Yoon, Hun Jung, Kwang-Woo Nam
openaire   +1 more source

Reply to letter to the editor by Franco et al. AMSTAR 2 overall confidence rating: A call for even more transparency

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
Robert C. Lorenz, Dawid Pieper, Tanja Rombey, Anja Jacobs, Olesja Rissling, Simone Freitag, Katja Matthias   +6 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Minor differences were found between AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS in the assessment of systematic reviews including both randomized and nonrandomized studies

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2019
Dawid Pieper, Livia Puljak, Marien González-Lorenzo   +2 more
exaly  

Assessing the Quality of Systematic Reviews in Healthcare Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR2

Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 2020
Karina Karolina Kedzior
exaly  

Methodological Quality Evaluation of a Systematic Review of Dementia Elderly Rehabilitation Study in Korea Applying AMSTAR-2

The Journal of Next-generation Convergence Technology Association, 2022
Seung-il Song, Hyeon Taek Hong, Hwan Kim
openaire   +1 more source

Quality assessment versus risk of bias in systematic reviews: AMSTAR and ROBIS had similar reliability but differed in their construct and applicability

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2018
Rita Banzi, Michela Cinquini, Marien González-Lorenzo   +2 more
exaly