Results 231 to 240 of about 147,103 (258)

Error Argumentation Enhance Adaptability in Adults With Low Motor Ability

Journal of Motor Behavior, 2015
The authors focused on young adults with varying degrees of motor difficulties and examined their adaptability in a visuomotor adaptation task where the visual feedback of participants' movement error was presented with either 1:1 ratio (i.e., regular feedback schedule) or 1:2 ratio (i.e., enhanced feedback schedule).
Chi-Mei, Lee, Jin, Bo
openaire   +2 more sources

Personality and Ability Effects on Reactions to Argumentative Unfairness

Social Justice Research, 2002
The study focusses on the relationship of personality and reactions to unfair argumentative contributions. Unfair contributions were embedded in four argumentative episodes and presented in written, auditory, and role-play mode. Each participant's cognitions, emotions, and verbal responses were assessed and aggregated across the four episodes. Although
openaire   +1 more source

Argumentative abilities in metacognition and in metalinguistics: a study on university students

European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2011
The article presents a study on metalinguistic, cognitive and metacognitive abilities in university students. A sample of 353 students was recruited; 178 of which from scientific and 175 from humanistic Faculties, with gender balance (M = 178; F = 175) whose age range was between 20 and 25 years old. They were administered a metalinguistic ability test
PINTO, Maria Antonietta, Paolo Iliceto, MELOGNO, Sergio   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

The effects of a course in argumentation on critical thinking ability∗

Speech Monographs, 1949
(1949). The effects of a course in argumentation on critical thinking ability. Speech Monographs: Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 177-189.
openaire   +1 more source

On-line synchronous scientific argumentation learning: Nurturing students' argumentation ability and conceptual change in science context

Computers & Education, 2010
The purpose of this study is to examine the difference in effectiveness between two on-line scientific learning programs - one with an argumentation component and one without an argumentation component - on students' scientific argumentation ability and conceptual change. A quasi-experimental design was used in this study.
Kuan-Hue Yeh, Hsiao-Ching She
openaire   +2 more sources

Developing argumentation ability as a way to promote technological literacy

International Journal of Educational Research, 2009
Abstract The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of three instructional methods on students’ technological literacy (TL) and argumentation ability. Participants were 285 seventh grade Israeli boys and girls (12–13-year-old) who studied in 18 technology classes in four junior high schools.
Cilla Choresh, Zemira R. Mevarech, Moti Frank   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Accountability Breeds Response-Ability: Contextual Debiasing and Accountability in Argumentation

2017
While there is growing consensus over the need to counteract biases in contexts of argumentation and decision-making, researchers disagree over which debiasing techniques are likely to be most effective. I attempt to show that contextual debiasing is more effective than cognitive debiasing in preventing biases, although I challenge the claim that ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Facts, Abilities and Concepts: Knowledge Argument and Physicalism

Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy, 2023
Napoleon Mabaquiao, Jose Ramon de Leon
openaire   +1 more source

Preliminary Study on the Relationship Between Children’s Ability to Self-Assess Arguments and their Argument Skills: A Case Study on “Objects and Weights” in Third-Grade Elementary School Introducing Argumentation with Claims-Evidence-Reasoning

Journal of Research in Science Education, 2021
Tomokazu Yamamoto
exaly  

Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination

Argumentation, 2023
Mika Hietanen, Annika Maria Svedholm-Häkkinen, Jonathan Baron   +2 more
exaly