Results 1 to 10 of about 7,262,487 (298)
Argument Quality and Cultural Difference
, 2017 Central to argumentation theory is a concern with normativity. Argumentation theorists are concerned, among other things, with explaining why some arguments are good in the sense that a given argument provides reasons for embracing its conclusion. This conception of argument quality presupposes that the goodness of arguments is characterizable in terms
Harvey Siegel
exaly +4 more sources
Argument Quality in Real World Argumentation [PDF]
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2020 The idea of resolving dispute through the exchange of arguments and reasons has been central to society for millennia. We exchange arguments as a way of getting at the truth in contexts as diverse as science, the court room, and our everyday lives. In democracies, political decisions should be negotiated through argument, not deception, or even worse ...
Ulrike Hahn
exaly +3 more sources
Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory
Informal Logic, 2015 Virtue argumentation theory (VAT) has been charged of being incomplete, given its alleged inability to account for argument cogency in virtue-theoretical terms. Instead of defending VAT against that challenge, I suggest it is misplaced, since it is based
Fabio Paglieri
doaj +8 more sources
CognitionNot all arguments are equally convincing, and whilst a given argument may be persuasive to some people, it is often seen as inadequate by others. We are interested in both the individual and argument level differences that make 'everyday' arguments such as those on social media persuasive.
Henrik Singmann
exaly +3 more sources
Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 2020 This article has been removed at the request of Professor Safnil Arsyad because the criteria for research output required by the research funder have yet to fulfill.
Safnil Arsyad +3 more
doaj +5 more sources
The Impact of Electronic Word of Mouth on Tourists Visit Intention to Saudi Arabia: Argument Quality and Source Credibility as Mediators [PDF]
African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 2021 The study objective was to examine the mediating role of source credibility and argument quality in the relationship between e-WOM and tourist visit intentions.
Dalal Hodaed Alsheikh +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Intrinsic Quality Assessment of Arguments [PDF]
Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2020 Several quality dimensions of natural language arguments have been investigated. Some are likely to be reflected in linguistic features (e.g., an argument's arrangement), whereas others depend on context (e.g., relevance) or topic knowledge (e.g., acceptability).
Henning Wachsmuth, Till Werner
openaire +3 more sources
Factors affecting the credibility of online reviews on TIKI: An assessment study in Vietnam [PDF]
International Journal of Data and Network Science, 2020 The purpose of this study was to test the determinants affecting the credibility of online reviews. In this model, the relationships between argument quality and peripheral cue and credibility of online reviews were evaluated.
Van Dat Tran, Thu Kiet Can
doaj +1 more source
Systems, 2023 Vaccination-related information is important for the public to increase vaccine acceptance intention, while the guidance and persuasion effects of information are influenced by approaches to information presentation.
Xi Chen +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Quality improvement: An argument for difference
Medical Education, 2022 The 2023 State of the Science guest editors (and colleagues) reflect on the many definitions of quality and challenges created for a field that emphasises quality improvement.
Janet Grant +4 more
openaire +3 more sources