Results 21 to 30 of about 7,262,487 (298)
Efficient Pairwise Annotation of Argument Quality [PDF]
Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020 We present an efficient annotation framework for argument quality, a feature difficult to be measured reliably as per previous work. A stochastic transitivity model is combined with an effective sampling strategy to infer high-quality labels with low effort from crowdsourced pairwise judgments.
Lukas Gienapp +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2021 This article discusses the usefulness of Toulmin’s model of arguments as structuring an assessment of different types of wrongness in an argument. We discuss the usability of the model within a conversational agent that aims to support users to develop a
Behzad Mirzababaei +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Graph Embeddings for Argumentation Quality Assessment
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, 2022 Argumentation is used by people both internally, by evaluating arguments and counterarguments to make sense of a situation and take a decision, and externally, e.g., in a debate, by exchanging arguments to reach an agreement or to promote an individual position.
Marro, Santiago +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Understanding Health Empowerment From the Perspective of Information Processing: Questionnaire Study
Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2022 BackgroundMassive, easily accessible online health information empowers users to cope with health problems better. Most patients search for relevant online health information before seeing a doctor to alleviate information ...
Fei Jiang +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Graph-based Argument Quality Assessment
Proceedings of the Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing - Deep Learning for Natural Language Processing Methods and Applications, 2021 The paper presents a novel discourse-based approach to argument quality assessment defined as a graph classification task, where the depth of reasoning (argumentation) is evident from the number and type of detected discourse units and relations between them.
Ekaterina Saveleva +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Predicting the Quality of Revisions in Argumentative Writing
Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2023), 2023 In The 18th BEA Workshop, held in conjunction with The Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), July ...
Zhexiong Liu +4 more
openaire +4 more sources
ArguBlogging:an application for the Argument Web [PDF]
, 2014 In this paper, we present a software tool for 'ArguBlogging', which allows users to construct debate and discussions across blogs, linking existing and new online resources to form distributed, structured conversations. Arguments and counterarguments can
Lawrence, John; id_orcid +11 more
core +2 more sources
2014 Texas Integrated Report Index of Water Quality Impairments [PDF]
, 2015 This technical report briefly describes the location and type of water quality concerns in Waller Creek.Waller Creek Working ...
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
core +1 more source
Virtue and argument: Taking character into account [PDF]
, 2013 In this paper we consider the prospects for an account of good argument that takes the character of the arguer into consideration. We conclude that although there is much to be gained by identifying the virtues of the good arguer and by considering the ...
Justine Kingsbury +3 more
core +1 more source
Argument quality evaluation experiment
, 2023 A survey experiment to study how argument source (partial, impartial, reluctant) and justification quality (private interest, common interest) influences argument quality ...
Kaisa Herne
core +1 more source