Results 11 to 20 of about 7,262,487 (298)
The effects of matching a persuasive message to a recipient's self-concept on attitude change [PDF]
Psihologija, 2010 The paper addresses the question of whether matching a persuasive message to a recipient's self-concept can enhance message processing. A large body of experiments within the Elaboration likelihood model proved that framing a message so as to be ...
Branković Marija, Žeželj Iris
doaj +1 more source
The effectiveness of using instagram content to promote charitable crowdfunding campaign
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2022 Crowdfunding has emerged as a new form of financing. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the differences in empathy and trust of potential donors when they find an Instagram content promoting charitable crowdfunding campaign using different types
Setiawan Mandala Putra +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Measuring university students’ ability to recognize argument structures and fallacies
Frontiers in Psychology, 2023 TheoryArgumentation is crucial for all academic disciplines. Nevertheless, a lack of argumentation skills among students is evident. Two core aspects of argumentation are the recognition of argument structures (e.g., backing up claims with premises ...
Yvonne Berkle +7 more
doaj +1 more source
The Effect of Argumentative Task Goal on the Quality of Argumentative Discourse [PDF]
Science Education, 2013 ABSTRACTIn argumentative discourse, there are two kinds of activity–dispute and deliberation–that depend on the argumentative task goal. In dispute the goal is to defend a conclusion by undermining alternatives, whereas in deliberation the goal is to arrive at a conclusion by contrasting alternatives. In this study, we examine the impact of these tasks
Garcia-Mila, Merce +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
Does it take a good argument to be persuaded? How manipulating quality of evidence affects message persuasiveness [PDF]
Psihologija, 2016 Two experiments investigated the effects of manipulating quality of evidence that supports arguments on message persuasiveness. The evidence quality was systematically manipulated by violating one or two of the relevant normative criteria.
Branković Marija, Žeželj Iris
doaj +1 more source
A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation [PDF]
Synthese, 2015 zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Ulrike Hahn, Jos Hornikx
openaire +3 more sources
Does Context Affect Argument Quality and Informal Reasoning in Socio-scientific Issues?
Science Education International, 2023 This research aimed to assess the quality of arguments and informal reasoning abilities of pre-service science teachers concerning various socio-scientific issues, utilizing dilemma cards.
Feride Ercan Yalman
doaj +1 more source
Frontiers in Communication, 2022 We study the influence of argument sources on argument quality evaluations. Argument source refers to the person who present the argument. We ask whether partial, impartial and reluctant sources generate different evaluations of argument quality.
Kaisa Herne +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments
Informal Logic, 2023 Many have argued that it is impossible to determine criteria to identify good arguments. In this contribution, we argue that it is at least possible to identify features of objectively bad arguments.
Michael Hoffmann, Richard Catrambone
doaj +1 more source
Learning to Rank with BERT for Argument Quality Evaluation
Proceedings of the International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, 2022 The task of argument quality ranking, which identifies the quality of free text arguments, remains, to this day, a challenge. While most state-of-the-art initiatives use point-wise ranking methods and predict an absolute quality score for each argument ...
Charles-Olivier Favreau +2 more
doaj +1 more source