Results 11 to 20 of about 3,024 (290)
Argument Mining Using Argumentation Scheme Structures [PDF]
, 2016 Argumentation schemes are patterns of human reasoning which have been detailed extensively in philosophy and psychology. In this paper we demonstrate that the structure of such schemes can provide rich information to the task of automatically identify complex argumentative structures in natural language text.
John Lawrence, Chris Reed 0001
openaire +3 more sources
Encompassing Uncertainty in Argumentation Schemes. [PDF]
, 2014 peer ...
BARONI, Pietro +3 more
openaire +4 more sources
Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essays
Computational Linguistics, 2017 In this article, we present a novel approach for parsing argumentation structures. We identify argument components using sequence labeling at the token level and apply a new joint model for detecting argumentation structures.
Christian Stab, Iryna Gurevych
doaj +2 more sources
A classification system for argumentation schemes [PDF]
Argument & Computation, 2015 This paper explains the importance of classifying argumentation schemes, and outlines how schemes are being used in current research in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics on argument mining. It provides a survey of the literature on scheme classification.
Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno
openaire +3 more sources
Identifying Argumentation Schemes [PDF]
, 2015 Argumentation is always a defense of a point of view: (a) Mother: “I don’t think five pounds pocket money is at all necessary; your sister always got two pounds a week.” Daughter: “That was years ago, and Betty, Monica, and all my other girlfriends get five or six pounds.” (b) History teacher: “Funny that you don’t want ...
van Eemeren, F.H., Kruiger, T.
openaire +2 more sources
Arguments of Statutory Interpretation and Argumentation Schemes [PDF]
International Journal of Legal Discourse, 2021 AbstractIn this paper it is shown how certain defeasible argumentation schemes can be used to represent the logical structure of the most common types of argument used for statutory interpretation both in civil and common law. The method is based on an argumentation structure in which the conclusion, namely, the meaning attributed to a legal source, is
Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton
openaire +2 more sources
Argumentative Scheme for Abduction
Дискурс, 2023 Introduction. The paper scrutinizes abduction through the lens of the argumentation theory. Abduction is treated as an argument with a special argumentative scheme.
A. S. Bobrova
doaj +1 more source
Theoria, 2014 I offer an account of a fortiori arguments in the context of a Toulmin-style theory of argumentation schemes. A fortiori arguments contain a comparison of the strength of two or more arguments involving scalar inferences.
Hubert Marraud
doaj +1 more source
The Argumentation Scheme from Vicarious Liability [PDF]
, 2023 peer reviewedIn this paper, we propose the formalisation of a new argu- mentation scheme for the domain of legal argumentation, which we call Argument from Vicarious Liability.
LIGA, Davide
core
Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments
Informal Logic, 2001 Current practice in logic increasingly accords recognition to abductive, presumptive or plausible arguments, in addition to deductive and inductive arguments. But there is uncertainty about what these terms exactly mean, what the differences between them
Douglas Walton
doaj +1 more source