Results 261 to 270 of about 3,024 (290)

Argumentation Schemes

2008
This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation schemes from the ground up, the book takes the reader from
Douglas Walton, Christopher Reed, Fabrizio Macagno   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes

Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2009
Legal reasoning typically requires a variety of argumentation schemes to be used together. A legal case may raise issues requiring argument from precedent cases, rules, policy goals, moral principles, jurisprudential doctrine, social values and evidence.
Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton
openaire   +1 more source

Argumentation Schemes for Legal Presumption of Causality

Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2023
Causal reasoning is a challenging topic not only in philosophy, science and in theories of human mind, but also in legal reasoning. Causality is indeed a key precondition for civil and criminal liability, in all cases dealing with the connection between human actions or omissions and harmful events.
Ruta Liepina, Adam Z. Wyner, Giovanni Sartor, Francesca Lagioia   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures

Argumentation, 2004
Many public information documents attempt to persuade the recipients that they should engage in or refrain from specific behaviour. This is based on the assumption that the recipient will decide about his or her behaviour on the basis of the information given and a rational evaluation of the pros and cons. An analysis of 20 public information brochures
Schellens, P.J., Jong, M.D. de
openaire   +3 more sources

Computationally-Friendly Argumentation Schemes

2014 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT), 2014
In an agent activity both paradigmatic aspects of communication and reasoning can be naturally enriched by argumentation. The contribution of this research is a computationally-friendly framework for formalizing paraconsistent argumentation schemes in information-rich environments.
Barbara Dunin-Keplicz, Alina Strachocka
openaire   +1 more source

Hybrid Reasoning with Argumentation Schemes

2008
Practical reasoning typically requires a variety of argumentation schemes to be used together to solve problems and make decisions. For example, a legal case may raise issues requiring argument from precedent cases, rules, policy goals, moral principles, jurisprudential doctrine, social values and evidence. This tutorial presents an introduction to the
Gordon Thomas F., Fokus Fraunhofer
openaire   +1 more source

Using Argumentation Schemes for Argument Extraction

International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, 2012
This paper surveys the state-of-the-art of argumentation schemes used as argument extraction techniques in cognitive informatics and uses examples to show how a series of connected problems needs to be solved to move these techniques forward to computational implementation.
openaire   +1 more source

Students' dialogic and justifying moves during dialogic argumentation in mathematics and physics

Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2022
Markus Hähkiöniemi, Jenna Hiltunen, Kaisa Jokiranta   +2 more
exaly  

Intergroup Argumentation in City Government Decision Making

Small Group Research, 2012
Stephenson J Beck
exaly  

Argumentation and participation patterns in general chemistry peer‐led sessions

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013
Richard S Moog, Jennifer E Lewis
exaly