Results 41 to 50 of about 79,540 (181)
Argumentation schemes for collaborative planning [PDF]
, 2011 Postprin
A. Belesiotis +4 more
core +3 more sources
Reasoning COVID-19: the use of spatial metaphor in times of a crisis
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 2022 As other crises before, the COVID-19 pandemic put established discursive routines at stake. By framing the pandemic as a crisis, an immediate search for adequate counter-measures started to define proper means of mitigation and protection for the ...
Dominik Kremer, Tilo Felgenhauer
doaj +1 more source
Knowledge Cartography for Controversies: The Iraq Debate [PDF]
, 2008 In analysing controversies and debates—which would include reviewing a literature in order to plan research, or assessing intelligence to formulate policy—there is no one worldview which can be mapped, for instance as a single, coherent concept map.
A. Kahane +8 more
core +1 more source
On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments [PDF]
Argumentation, 2004 We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the basis for developing a natural classification of arguments, benefit work in artificial intelligence. Focusing only on arguments construed as the semantic entities that are the outcome of processes of reasoning, we outline and clarify our view that an argument is a ...
Katzav, Joel, Reed, Chris
openaire +4 more sources
Learning by Arguing About Evidence and Explanations [PDF]
, 2008 Collaborative learning with cases characteristically involves discussing and developing shared explanations. We investigated the argumentation scheme which learners use in constructing shared explanations over evidence.
Asgari-Targhi, M, Dowell, J
core
A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning [PDF]
, 2006 Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) is often based on written argumentative discourse of learners, who discuss their perspectives on a problem with the goal to acquire knowledge.
Armin Weinberger +61 more
core +4 more sources
How to Play the “Playing God” Card [PDF]
, 2020 When the phrase “playing God” is used in debates concerning the use of new technologies, such as cloning or genetic engineering, it is usually interpreted as a warning not to interfere with God’s creation or nature.
Mizrahi, Moti
core +1 more source
Circles and analogies in public health reasoning [PDF]
, 2015 The study of the fallacies has changed almost beyond recognition since Charles Hamblin called for a radical reappraisal of this area of logical inquiry in his 1970 book Fallacies.
Cummings, L
core +1 more source
Witness Impeachment in Cross-Examination Using Ad Hominem Argumentation
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2018 This paper combines methods of argumentation theory and artificial intelligence to extend existing work on the dialectical structure of crossexamination. The existing method used conflict diagrams to search for inconsistent statements in the testimony of
Walton Douglas
doaj +1 more source
On Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments for Persuasive Reasoning
Applied Artificial Intelligence, 2019 Analogical reasoning is a complex process based on a comparison between two pairs of concepts or states of affairs (aka. the source and the target) for characterizing certain features from one to another.
Teeradaj Racharak +3 more
doaj +1 more source