Results 161 to 170 of about 782,170 (213)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Background Illumination and Automated Perimetry
Archives of Ophthalmology, 1986Visual field function in the right and left eyes of 31 normal volunteers was evaluated with an automated projection perimeter (OCTOPUS). Serial visual field evaluations were repeated in these same eyes with neutral filters of increasing optical density.
K M, Klewin, R L, Radius
+7 more sources
A Comparison of Peritest Automated Perimetry and Goldmann Perimetry
Archives of Ophthalmology, 1985Both Peritest perimetry and Goldmann visual field testing were performed on three groups of eyes. Eighty-one eyes had glaucoma with elevated intraocular pressures and abnormal visual fields determined by Goldmann perimetry. There were 47 eyes with suspected glaucoma, based on elevated IOPs and normal Goldmann visual fields.
M L, Hotchkiss +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry and Motion Automated Perimetry in Patients With Glaucoma
Archives of Ophthalmology, 1997To compare short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), a test favoring the detection of the target by the parvocellular pathways of vision, with motion automated perimetry (MAP), a test favoring detection by the magnocellular pathways, in the same eyes.Thirty-three individuals in whom glaucoma was suspected (glaucoma suspects) and 17 patients with ...
P A, Sample, C F, Bosworth, R N, Weinreb
openaire +2 more sources
Effect of Cataract on Automated Perimetry
Ophthalmology, 1991Humphrey visual fields (30-2 program) were performed on 24 otherwise healthy patients before and after cataract extraction to examine the effect of cataract on automated visual fields. All patients met reliability index criteria and recovered visual acuity of 20/25 or better.
B L, Lam, W L, Alward, H E, Kolder
openaire +2 more sources
Compass fundus automated perimetry
European Journal of Ophthalmology, 2018Background: Compass (CenterVue, Padova, Italy) is a fundus automated perimeter which has been introduced in the clinical practice for glaucoma management in 2014. The aim of the article is to review Compass literature, comparing its performances against Humphrey Field Analyzer (Zeiss Humphrey Systems, Dublin, CA,
Paolo, Fogagnolo +5 more
openaire +2 more sources
Feasibility and outcome of automated kinetic perimetry in children
Visual field testing in children is often performed using a Goldmann perimeter. Because the technique is performed manually, it is difficult to standardize, and stimuli are often presented too quickly.
Bettina Kathrin Wabbels, Birgit Lorenz
exaly +2 more sources
Some aspects of the automation of perimetry
Survey of Ophthalmology, 1977Manual perimetry has certain inherent limitations stemming from both the patient and the examiner. Automated perimetry, if properly developed, can offer the advantages of exact reproducibility of the examination strategy, accuracy achieved through averaging of repeated determinations, and systematic application of previous data to the current ...
F, Frankhauser, J, Spahr, H, Bebie
openaire +2 more sources
Threshold variation in automated perimetry
Survey of Ophthalmology, 1993A physiologic fluctuation in threshold levels exists in automated perimetry, which is greater in glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients than in normal subjects. Fluctuation increases with greater eccentricity from fixation and in areas of reduced retinal sensitivity.
W C, Stewart, H H, Hunt
openaire +2 more sources
Short-wavelength automated perimetry
Ophthalmology Clinics of North America, 2003Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) is a visual field test designed to assess the short-wavelength sensitive color system by isolating the blue-yellow pathway. SWAP is a powerful clinical tool able to detect visual field deficits 3 to 5 years before standard automated perimetry (white-on-white) in most glaucoma patients, and progression of ...
Lyne, Racette, Pamela A, Sample
openaire +2 more sources
Fatigue effects in automated perimetry
Applied Optics, 1988The influence of fatigue and related factors on automated perimetric testing was evaluated in both eyes of sixteen normal observers and sixteen patients with early-to-moderate visual field loss using a Digilab 750 automated perimeter and a customized test procedure.
C A, Johnson, C W, Adams, R A, Lewis
openaire +2 more sources

