Results 181 to 190 of about 782,170 (213)

False Positive Responses in Standard Automated Perimetry

American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2022
Aiko Iwase, Vincent Michael Patella
exaly  

Octopus 900 Automated Kinetic Perimetry versus Standard Automated Static Perimetry in Glaucoma Practice

Current Eye Research, 2021
Fiona J Rowe, Gabriella Czanner, Ishaana Sood   +2 more
exaly  

Automated perimetry

Ophthalmology, 2002
Maria F Delgado, Ngoc T.A Nguyen, Terry A Cox, Kuldev Singh, David A Lee, David K Dueker, Robert D Fechtner, Mark S Juzych, Shan C Lin, Peter A Netland, Scott A Pastor, Joel S Schuman, John R Samples   +12 more
openaire   +1 more source

Essentials of Automated Perimetry

2010
Standard automated perimetry is a standard method of measuring peripheral visual function. Automated static perimetry gained wide acceptance among clinicians due to the test’s high reproducibility and standardization and ability to store, exchange, and statistically analyze digital data.
openaire   +1 more source

The Future of Automated Perimetry

Journal of Glaucoma, 1993
openaire   +2 more sources

Automation of Perimetry: the Scoperimeter

Ophthalmologica, 2010
openaire   +2 more sources

Interpreting Automated Perimetry

American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1989
openaire   +2 more sources

Automated perimetry–Part II

American Intra-Ocular Implant Society Journal, 1984
openaire   +3 more sources

Automated Perimetry

Ophthalmology, 1996
openaire   +1 more source

Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients

European Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021
Francesco Comacchio, Chiara Longo, Roberta Mórbio   +2 more
exaly