Results 271 to 280 of about 13,385 (307)
Nonconvex bargaining problems [PDF]
, 2004 This paper studies compact and comprehensive bargaining problems for n players and axiomatically characterize the extensions of the three classical bargaining solutions to nonconvex bargaining problems: the Nash solution, the egalitarian solution and the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution.
Xu, Yongsheng, Yoshihara, Naoki
openaire
Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims [PDF]
, 2004 zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Simon Gächter, Arno Riedl
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Nash Bargaining Solutions of Multiparty Bargaining Problems
1987In multiparty systems situations often arise in which various coalitions could form and each potential coalition must decide on how the gains from their joint action should be shared. We view these situations as multilateral bargaining problems, take into account how players’ opportunities in other coalitions should affect their disagreement payoffs ...
openaire +1 more source
A superadditive solution for cephoidal bargaining problems
International Journal of Game Theory, 2006zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Pallaschke, Diethard +1 more
openaire +3 more sources
A characterization of the leximin solution of the bargaining problem
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research (ZOR), 1999zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Chih Chang, Yan-An Hwang
openaire +1 more source
Two-Person Bargaining Problems with Incomplete Information [PDF]
Econometrica, 1984 Summary: A generalization of the Nash bargaining solution is defined for two- person bargaining problems with incomplete information. These solutions form the smallest set satisfying three axioms: a probability-invariance axiom, an extension (or independence of irrelevant alternatives) axiom, and a random-dictatorship axiom.
openaire +2 more sources
Bargaining or Problem Solving?
1994Abstract Chapter 5 concluded that subcontracting relations in a sample of electronics producers from Japan were on the whole more asset specific than were those in a comparable sample from the United Kingdom and that strategy probably matters in determining the degree of asset specificity.
openaire +1 more source
Information and bargaining in the hold‐up problem
The RAND Journal of Economics, 2008This article incorporates an information structure with partial information into the canonical hold‐up problem. The optimal information structure balances the tradeoff between ex ante efficiency (the “information rent” effect) and ex post efficiency (the “bargaining disagreement” effect). With one‐shot bargaining, it occurs at an intermediate level of
openaire +1 more source
Towards Interactive Solutions in a Bargaining Problem
1989The paper deals with interactive arbitration processes in a bargaining problem. Principles of constructing such processes are discussed, and several solution concepts are considered, first in unicriterial and then in multicriterial case. The analysis is preceded by a review of the axiomatic basis of Nash and Raiffa solution concepts.
Bronisz, Piotr +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
2007
Bargaining is a process to decide how to divide shared resources between two or more players. And axiomatic bargaining specifies desirable and simple properties the outcome of the bargaining should satisfy and identifies the solution that produces this outcome. This approach was first developed by John Nash in his seminal work(Nash 1950). Since then,
openaire +1 more source
Bargaining is a process to decide how to divide shared resources between two or more players. And axiomatic bargaining specifies desirable and simple properties the outcome of the bargaining should satisfy and identifies the solution that produces this outcome. This approach was first developed by John Nash in his seminal work(Nash 1950). Since then,
openaire +1 more source