Results 241 to 250 of about 2,052,393 (261)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
A Syntactical Approach to Belief Update
2005In the Belief Change domain, Katsuno and Mendelzon have proposed a set of postulates that should be satisfied by update operators. In 1989, Forbus semantically defined an update operator that satisfies these postulates. In order to calculate the resulting belief base all models of the relevant belief bases must be known.
Jerusa Marchi +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Updating Directed Belief Networks
1999This paper deals with the knowledge representation and reasoning in directed belief networks. These networks are similar to those defined by Pearl (causal networks), but instead of probability functions, we use belief functions. Based on the work of Cano et al.
Boutheina Ben Yaghlane, Khaled Mellouli
openaire +1 more source
An experimental study of updating ambiguous beliefs
Risk Decision and Policy, 2000‘Ambiguous beliefs’ are beliefs which are inconsistent with a unique, additive prior. The problem of their update in face of new information has been dealt with in the theoretical literature, and received several contradictory answers. In particular, the ‘maximum likelihood update’ and the ‘full Bayesian update’ have been axiomatized. This experimental
Cohen, Michèle D. +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
The Compactness of Belief Revision and Update Operators
Fundamenta Informaticae, 2004A propositional knowledge base can be seen as a compact representation of a set of models. When a knowledge base T is updated with a formula P, the resulting set of models can be represented in two ways: either by a theory T' that is equivalent to T*P or by the pair 〈T,P〉. The second representation can be super-polinomially more compact than the first.
LIBERATORE, Paolo, SCHAERF, Marco
openaire +4 more sources
A Unified View of Belief Revision and Update
Journal of Logic and Computation, 1994It is generally accepted that a distinction may be drawn between belief revision and belief updating. As the authors of the paper under review put it, ``loosely speaking, the former says that the beliefs may have been wrong and in need of revision, whereas the latter says that the beliefs were correct, but the world has in the meanwhile evolved and the
Alvaro del Val, Yoav Shoham
openaire +2 more sources
Belief Update as Social Choice
2010Dynamic epistemic-doxastic logics describe the new knowledge or new beliefs indexBelief of agents after some informational event has happened. Technically, this requires an update rule that turns a doxastic-epistemic modelM(recording the current information state of the agents) and a dynamic ‘event model’ E (modeling the relevant, possibly complex ...
openaire +3 more sources
When Beliefs Face Reality: An Integrative Review of Belief Updating in Mental Health and Illness
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021Tobias Kube, Liron Rozenkrantz
exaly
Optimism where there is none: Asymmetric belief updating observed with valence-neutral life events
Cognition, 2022Punit Shāh +2 more
exaly
Causal Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Belief Updating under Uncertainty
Cerebral Cortex, 2021Stefan Schulreich +2 more
exaly

