Results 1 to 10 of about 41,479 (193)
Beyond Reasonable Doubt: An Abductive Dilemma in Criminal Law
In criminal cases at common law, juries are permitted to convict on wholly circumstantial evidence even in the face of a reasonable case for acquittal. This generates the highly counterintuitive—if not absurd—consequence that there being reason to think ...
John Woods
doaj +2 more sources
James Bradley Thayer i problem „niekonstytucyjności ponad wszelką wątpliwość”
James Bardley Thayer and the Problem of „Unconstitutionality Beyond Reasonable Doubt” The main purpose of this paper is the presentation of Harvard Law School scholar James Bradley Thayer and his ...
Jerzy Zajadło
doaj +1 more source
Based on the modern achievements of the national science in criminal procedure and the development of the theory of evidence in criminal proceedings, in particular, its standardization, the author examines the theoretical prerequisites for ...
R. M. Balats
doaj +1 more source
Priority or delay "Presumption of Continuity" on The Rule of Dra [PDF]
Inconsistency occurs sometimes between two indications, sometimes between two principles, and still sometimes other between an indication and a principle.
Hamid Reza Zangiabadi +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Indirect Evidence – A Constitutional-Legal Basis for Conviction? [PDF]
The practice of Georgia’s general courts in applying a ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ standard being necessary for convicting a defendant is inconsistent. Whereas until recently, at least two direct pieces of evidence were required to convict a person, in its
Mariam Chikadze , Irakli Jojua
doaj
STANDARDS OF PROOF: A COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW FROM THE UKRAINIAN PERSPECTIVE
The article addresses the issue of standards of proof from a comparative perspective. The author sketches the conventional distinction between common law and civil law countries in this regard, as well as some approaches that query the validity of the
Bohdan Karnaukh
doaj +1 more source
The Standard of Proof in Criminal Proceedings: the Threshold to Prove Guilt under Ethiopian Law
The standard of proof plays a vital role in the process of administration of justice. In criminal proceedings, the standard stipulates the degree to which the party who has the burden of proof needs to establish the facts constituting the elements of ...
HA Zemichael
doaj +1 more source
Se presenta la propuesta del profesor Ferrer de dotar de contenido epistémico-intersubjetivo al ampliamente usado estándar de prueba penal que autoriza una condena sólo si se ha demostrado la culpabilidad del acusado más allá de toda duda razonable.
Edgar R. Aguilera
doaj +1 more source
In contemporary legal epistemology it is common to talk about the “paradox of expert testimony”, which can be formulated as follows: “how can the judge assess information provided by an expert witness if he needs him precisely because of his own lack of ...
Gaetano Carlizzi
doaj +1 more source
La fuerza de la sangre, beyond a reasonable doubt: la cuestión del doble final
En noviembre de 1990, durante el Tercer Coloquio Internacional de la Asociación de Cervantistas, celebrado en Alcalá de Henares, la profesora Ellen Lokos de la universidad de Harvard, USA, en la comunicación titulada Máscaras, mentiras, matrimonio final:
Matías Escalera Cordero
doaj +1 more source

