Results 11 to 20 of about 2,537,634 (144)
Judging Beyond Any Reasonable Doubt [PDF]
Quaestio FactiThe doubt is not related to innocence but only to guilt, the latter being the exclusive object of the process. The proof of guilt, being always of inductive nature, cannot accept the deductive method that connotes the relationship between premise (minor
Rocco Neri
doaj +2 more sources
Reasonable Doubt in Islamic Law [PDF]
, 2015 Doubt pervades most laws, becomes alarming when it arises in criminal law, and seems especially discomfiting in the context of Islamic criminal law. In the high-stakes area of American criminal prosecutions, dubious facts or ambiguous laws can result in ...
Rabb, Intisar A., Rabb, Intisar
core +6 more sources
Do Juries Understand the Criminal Standard of Proof of Beyond Reasonable Doubt? [PDF]
, 2021 In Green v The Queen and La Fontaine v The Queen, the High Court stated that it is both unnecessary and unwise for a trial judge to seek to explain to the jury the meaning of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’, on the ground that the phrase is well understood ...
Hemming, Andrew
core +1 more source
Beyond Reasonable Doubt: An Abductive Dilemma in Criminal Law
Informal Logic, 2008 In criminal cases at common law, juries are permitted to convict on wholly circumstantial evidence even in the face of a reasonable case for acquittal. This generates the highly counterintuitive—if not absurd—consequence that there being reason to think ...
John Woods
doaj +1 more source
STANDARDS OF PROOF: A COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW FROM THE UKRAINIAN PERSPECTIVE
Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2021 The article addresses the issue of standards of proof from a comparative perspective. The author sketches the conventional distinction between common law and civil law countries in this regard, as well as some approaches that query the validity of the
Bohdan Karnaukh
doaj +1 more source
The Standard of Proof in Criminal Proceedings: the Threshold to Prove Guilt under Ethiopian Law
Mizan Law Review, 2015 The standard of proof plays a vital role in the process of administration of justice. In criminal proceedings, the standard stipulates the degree to which the party who has the burden of proof needs to establish the facts constituting the elements of ...
HA Zemichael
doaj +1 more source
Ciencia Ergo Sum, 2020 Se presenta la propuesta del profesor Ferrer de dotar de contenido epistémico-intersubjetivo al ampliamente usado estándar de prueba penal que autoriza una condena sólo si se ha demostrado la culpabilidad del acusado más allá de toda duda razonable.
Edgar R. Aguilera
doaj +1 more source
Quaestio Facti, 2020 In contemporary legal epistemology it is common to talk about the “paradox of expert testimony”, which can be formulated as follows: “how can the judge assess information provided by an expert witness if he needs him precisely because of his own lack of ...
Gaetano Carlizzi
doaj +1 more source
La fuerza de la sangre, beyond a reasonable doubt: la cuestión del doble final
Verba Hispanica, 1992 En noviembre de 1990, durante el Tercer Coloquio Internacional de la Asociación de Cervantistas, celebrado en Alcalá de Henares, la profesora Ellen Lokos de la universidad de Harvard, USA, en la comunicación titulada Máscaras, mentiras, matrimonio final:
Matías Escalera Cordero
doaj +1 more source
Justitia Et Pax, 2019 Article 25 of HIR provides that in case the defendant does not appear at court process (verstek), the claim will be accepted unless it is unreasonable and against the rights. In the beginning, that article was interpreted that in case the defendant doesn’
Elisabeth Sundari +1 more
doaj +1 more source